| 1 |
Yeah.
.
.
I
still
think
adding
a
substantial
energy
requirement
to
using
the
superweapons
would
would
be
the
most
interesting
way
to
address
balance
with
detriments.
Any
non-madman
would
have
a
lot
of
energy
on
hand,
but
if
the
superweapon
eats
that,
it
could
force
some
interesting
choices.
You
could
even
make
the
superweapons
scalable
with
energy
input
.
.
.
kind
of
overdriven.
:)
Cmon
you
know
you
want
to
do
that.
|
1 |
Yeah.
.
.
I
still
think
adding
a
substantial
energy
requirement
to
using
the
superweapons
would
would
be
the
most
interesting
way
to
address
balance
with
detriments.
Any
non-madman
would
have
a
lot
of
energy
on
hand,
but
if
the
superweapon
eats
that,
it
could
force
some
interesting
choices
(
economic
and
defensive)
.
You
could
even
make
the
superweapons
scalable
with
energy
input
.
.
.
kind
of
overdriven.
:)
Cmon
you
know
you
want
to
do
that.
|
Future detriment refinement