| 1 |
[q]This seems like it would require a wider range of anti-underwater-heavy units to be sensible. Also it would be the boringly always correct choice on water maps.[/q]
|
1 |
[q]This seems like it would require a wider range of anti-underwater-heavy units to be sensible. Also it would be the boringly always correct choice on water maps.[/q]
|
| 2 |
While true, some configurations of such would alleviate the commander's total vulnerability in sea, making the game a lot less weird.
|
2 |
While true, some configurations of such would alleviate the commander's total vulnerability in sea, making the game a lot less weird.
|
| 3 |
\n
|
3 |
\n
|
| 4 |
Separately, a floatation module could allow the com to defend at least against surface-to-underwater attackers such as Archer, leaving only Seawolf, Duck and Scallop to worry about as U2U threats.
|
4 |
Separately, a floatation module could allow the com to defend at least against surface-to-underwater attackers such as Archer, leaving only Seawolf, Duck and Scallop to worry about as U2U threats.
|
|
|
5 |
\n
|
|
|
6 |
Combining the weapon and the float in one package would seem to solve most of the issues with the weapon. Or even making floatation a default thing for commanders.
|
Anti sub options