Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

Are transports supposed to transport ships?

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
12/28/2020 1:59:12 AMAUrankAdminAquanim before revert after revert
Before After
1 [quote]Without the ability to move, their usefulness is quite limited. Ships are also quite expensive across the board, meaning that it makes more sense to just build a Cerberus if you want fixed artillery on land. A Cerberus costs roughly 3 Envoys or so, and about half of a Shogun.[/quote] 1 [quote]Without the ability to move, their usefulness is quite limited. Ships are also quite expensive across the board, meaning that it makes more sense to just build a Cerberus if you want fixed artillery on land. A Cerberus costs roughly 3 Envoys or so, and about half of a Shogun.[/quote]
2 I think this is underselling Envoy and Shogun a bit, and it is *definitely* underselling Scylla. A mobile tacsilo is no joke. It is more often done with Lobster though, to avoid anti-air and generally have a bit more flexibility. 2 I think this is underselling Envoy and Shogun a bit, and it is *definitely* underselling Scylla. A mobile tacsilo is no joke. It is more often done with Lobster though, to avoid anti-air and generally have a bit more flexibility.
3 \n
4 Outside of maybe Scylla it is not something I would do without a good reason to want ships on water as well, though.