| 1 |
[q]Create a new account and play under a new name :) [/q]
|
1 |
[q]Create a new account and play under a new name :) [/q]
|
| 2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
| 3 |
Ruining game balance for others just so you don't have to take responsibility for your skill level is a pretty shitty attitude that deserves the highest condemnation.
|
3 |
Ruining game balance for others just so you don't have to take responsibility for your skill level is a pretty shitty attitude that deserves the highest condemnation.
|
|
|
4 |
\n
|
|
|
5 |
[q]I label spam the whole map if I want to educate the team. It's quite annoying if you are a new player and you can't see your own factory because of the messages I post there :(.
|
|
|
6 |
[/q]
|
|
|
7 |
\n
|
|
|
8 |
This is a communication problem. To understand the problem I want to address we need to look at the component pieces. Let's call the current communication standard "rush to door" -- we optimize for getting out the door instead of message quality. How many of these labels I wonder are effective at gathering attention and communicating their point across?
|
|
|
9 |
\n
|
|
|
10 |
Something like "attack here" is pretty crappy at doing its job. Who needs to attack here?
|
|
|
11 |
"build units" -- which units and where to send them?
|
|
|
12 |
"help front" -- where at the front? the front spans the entire map's length or width. Who needs to do it?
|
|
|
13 |
\n
|
|
|
14 |
Also note that coming off as micromanaging significantly decreases your odds of effective interpretation. We have to know when to give up.
|
B1027123 18 on Sacrifice_v1 (Multiplayer)