Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

FFA: Calling for a systematic hunt for P1s.

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
5/30/2021 8:38:45 PMSErankPLT_Godde before revert after revert
5/30/2021 8:37:04 PMSErankPLT_Godde before revert after revert
Before After
1 GoogleFrog wrote:[quote]I think a fundamental issue is that @RedEagle_P1 enjoys a much more casual FFA experience than the one desired by most FFA players...[/quote] 1 GoogleFrog wrote:[quote]I think a fundamental issue is that @RedEagle_P1 enjoys a much more casual FFA experience than the one desired by most FFA players...[/quote]
2 \n 2 \n
3 Disabling superweapons and putting units on hold fire to opponents for them to capture can be examples of not taking the game seriously. It can also be examples of colluding/allying and letting your teammate win. Colluding/allying/teaming up is a part of FFA. For serious FFA players, there is a line where colluding is considered unfun or ruining FFA. Arguably pre-game alliances fall into that. We all have preferences players and behaviours that makes us likely to team-up with some players. The question is where that line is drawn for colluding/allying/teaming that is considered to ruin FFA. 3 Disabling superweapons and putting units on hold fire to opponents for them to capture can be examples of not taking the game seriously. It can also be examples of colluding/allying and letting your teammate win. Colluding/allying/teaming up is a part of FFA. For serious FFA players, there is a line where colluding is considered unfun or ruining FFA. Arguably pre-game alliances fall into that. We all have preferences for some players and some behaviours that makes us likely to team-up with them. The question is where the line is drawn for colluding/allying/teaming that is considered to ruin Serious FFA.