Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

FFA: Calling for a systematic hunt for P1s.

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
5/30/2021 9:16:14 PMEErankAdminAnarchid before revert after revert
5/30/2021 9:14:45 PMEErankAdminAnarchid before revert after revert
5/30/2021 9:14:18 PMEErankAdminAnarchid before revert after revert
5/30/2021 9:13:08 PMEErankAdminAnarchid before revert after revert
5/30/2021 9:12:25 PMEErankAdminAnarchid before revert after revert
Before After
1 [q] I find this take kinda weird Anarchid.[/q] 1 [q] I find this take kinda weird Anarchid.[/q]
2 Nonweird takes can be fully inferred from the orthodox position, and thus valueless. I take this as a compliment. 2 Nonweird takes can be fully inferred from the orthodox position, and thus valueless. I take this as a compliment.
3 \n 3 \n
4 [q]The most substantiated claim against RedEagle is that he plays FFA too casually and not "serious" enough according to GoogleFrog and Anir.[/q] 4 [q]The most substantiated claim against RedEagle is that he plays FFA too casually and not "serious" enough according to GoogleFrog and Anir.[/q]
5 Casualness is a claim about RedEagles's feelings. I take it as an attempt at online psychology: useful inasmuch as modelling your possible FFA opponent is; limited inasmuch as online psychology. 5 Casualness is a claim about RedEagles's feelings. I take it as an attempt at online psychology: useful inasmuch as modelling your possible FFA opponent is; limited inasmuch as online psychology.
6 \n 6 \n
7 [q]However, if FFA is played Hunger Game-style where pregame alliances are okey, the probable collusion and collaboration that the clan P1 has done, is simply acceptable play.[/q] 7 [q]However, if FFA is played Hunger Game-style where pregame alliances are okey, the probable collusion and collaboration that the clan P1 has done, is simply acceptable play.[/q]
8 I have no claim for or against this. My take is that regardless of existence of a claim of mine to make, the other players of FFA games being simply aware of this fact is likely sufficient to have the hunt-down effect through the mechanism of common knowledge. 8 I have no claim for or against this. My take is that regardless of existence of a claim of mine to make, the other players of FFA games being simply aware of this fact is likely sufficient to have the hunt-down effect through the mechanism of common knowledge.
9 \n 9 \n
10 [q]I don't think a member of the moderator team should promote behavior that is currently either against the rules or will be against the rules in the future for "serious" FFA play when such guidelines haven't been properly established.[/q] 10 [q]I don't think a member of the moderator team should promote behavior that is currently either against the rules or will be against the rules in the future for "serious" FFA play when such guidelines haven't been properly established.[/q]
11 It is not against rules to gang up against a faction that holds a disproportionate amount of resources and win% in an FFA, as far as i know. 11 It is not against rules to gang up against a faction that holds a disproportionate amount of resources and win% in an FFA, as far as i know.
12 \n 12 \n
13 [spoiler]Although you would like it to be so, wouldn't you, you eddog :P[/spoiler] 13 [spoiler]Although you would like it to be so, wouldn't you, you eddog :P[/spoiler]
14 Moreover, i propose that this requires no [u]pregame[/u] collusion on the part of the players who gang up against the perceived ultimate threat, be it identified by a purple star next to the threat's identifier, or by another identifier in a simiar position, be it a flag, or a clan tag. 14 Moreover, i propose that this requires no [u]pregame[/u] collusion on the part of the players who gang up against the perceived ultimate threat, be it identified by a purple star next to the threat's identifier, or by another identifier in a similar position, be it a flag, or a clan tag.
15 \n 15 \n
16 [q]Also, where and how should players be allowed to play casual FFA? [/q] 16 [q]Also, where and how should players be allowed to play casual FFA? [/q]
17 What is "casual FFA"? The way i see it, so-called Casual WHR is the thing that dictates the color-coded caste of ZK players, almost without exception, and every FFA game bets a massive amount of that currency. 17 What is "casual FFA"? The way i see it, so-called Casual WHR is the thing that dictates the color-coded caste of ZK players, almost without exception, and every FFA game bets a massive amount of that currency.
18 \n 18 \n
19 All it takes for evil to triumph is for rational men to respond to incentives. 19 All it takes for evil to triumph is for rational men to respond to incentives.
20 \n
21 [spoiler]I confess to not being fully sober while writing this subtake. I may downregulate this post's existence within the next 16 hours. If i haven't done so, i guess my sober self agrees with it and it's here to stay[/spoiler]