Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

B1169691 2 on Intersection v4.1 (Multiplayer)

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
8/6/2021 1:30:10 PMAUrankAdminAquanim before revert after revert
8/6/2021 1:29:43 PMAUrankAdminAquanim before revert after revert
8/6/2021 1:29:19 PMAUrankAdminAquanim before revert after revert
8/6/2021 1:27:46 PMAUrankAdminAquanim before revert after revert
8/6/2021 1:26:12 PMAUrankAdminAquanim before revert after revert
8/6/2021 1:22:47 PMAUrankAdminAquanim before revert after revert
Before After
1 [quote]How is this different from an FPS player not enjoying aiming so programming something to aid him in this regard.[/quote] 1 [quote]How is this different from an FPS player not enjoying aiming so programming something to aid him in this regard.[/quote]
2 It is a black and white fact that aimbots are illegal in FPS communities. It is not a black and white fact that widgets which control units are illegal in this community. 2 It is a black and white fact that aimbots are illegal in FPS communities. It is not a black and white fact that widgets which control units are illegal in this community.
3 \n 3 \n
4 To be clear: I do not think the existence of this widget is good for Zero-K, or that it is acceptable for it to exist in the long term. I hope and expect it to be rendered technically infeasible in the near future. I think it is distasteful that somebody has used it in a ranked game without advertising its existence (note that this is discouraged, but not *explicitly* forbidden, by the Code of Conduct). I am, again, quite willing to retroactively mark this game as no-elo. 4 To be clear: I do not think the existence of this widget is good for Zero-K, or that it is acceptable for it to exist in the long term. I hope and expect it to be rendered technically infeasible in the near future. I think it is distasteful that somebody has used it in a ranked game without advertising its existence (note that this is discouraged, but not *explicitly* forbidden, by the Code of Conduct). I am, again, quite willing to retroactively mark this game as no-elo.
5 \n 5 \n
6 However, the bar for "this is so obviously against the rules that [b]any reasonable person[/b] should have known it in the absence of a specific admin statement and refrained from doing it, and therefore it is immediately bannable" is very high and I do not think this situation meets it. 6 However, the bar for "this is so obviously against the rules that [b]any reasonable person[/b] should have known it in the absence of a specific admin statement and refrained from doing it, and therefore it is immediately bannable" is very high and I do not think this situation meets it.
7 \n 7 \n
8 -- 8 --
9 \n 9 \n
10 For the record I am making no statement one way or the other on whether somebody using a widget like this again in the time between now and when it is rendered infeasible would be modactioned. As far as I am concerned that is a decision for @GoogleFrog to make. 10 For the record I am making no statement one way or the other on whether somebody using a widget like this again in the time between now and when it is rendered infeasible would be modactioned. As far as I am concerned that is a policy decision for @GoogleFrog to make and I am unaware of it having been made at this time.