| 1 |
[q]Is that not just because the massive fluctuation of rank for a player who frequents the lobpot/ffa is essentially unreliable as a metric for expected performance?[/q]
|
1 |
[q]Is that not just because the massive fluctuation of rank for a player who frequents the lobpot/ffa is essentially unreliable as a metric for expected performance?[/q]
|
| 2 |
You were so close to the correct answer.
|
2 |
You were so close to the correct answer.
|
| 3 |
\n
|
3 |
\n
|
| 4 |
All
gamemodes
that
do
not
directly
use
ranking
to
determine
sides
in
a
match
should
never
influence
team
ranking.
Namely
FFA
and
1v1
games
outside
of
matchmaker.
|
4 |
All
gamemodes
that
do
not
directly
use
ranking
to
determine
sides
in
a
match
should
never
influence
team
ranking.
Namely
FFA
and
1v1
games.
|
| 5 |
\n
|
5 |
\n
|
| 6 |
Ideally there would be a clear separation of rankings: Matchmaking 1v1, Teams small, Teams large, FFA ladder.
|
6 |
Ideally there would be a clear separation of rankings: Matchmaking 1v1, Teams small, Teams large, FFA ladder.
|
| 7 |
\n
|
7 |
\n
|
| 8 |
All of the above require a different approach, they have their own meta and unit tiers. Sadly, as I've repeated a few times in the past, people in charge will never let go of their FFA rank grinder which is the largest contributor to this stupidity.
|
8 |
All of the above require a different approach, they have their own meta and unit tiers. Sadly, as I've repeated a few times in the past, people in charge will never let go of their FFA rank grinder which is the largest contributor to this stupidity.
|
B1196550 21 on Comet Catcher Redux v3.1 (Multiplayer)