1 |
[s]Okay
first
things
first.
We
are
prepared
to
look
the
other
way
if
people
who
have
been
absent
for
a
long
time
want
a
fresh
start
but
this
post
isn't
really
giving
me
that
vibe,
so
@Remembrance
why
are
you
not
on
your
original
account?[/s]
I
see
this
was
discussed
in
another
thread.
|
1 |
[s]Okay
first
things
first.
We
are
prepared
to
look
the
other
way
if
people
who
have
been
absent
for
a
long
time
want
a
fresh
start
but
this
post
isn't
really
giving
me
that
vibe,
so
@Remembrance
why
are
you
not
on
your
original
account?[/s]
|
|
|
2 |
EDIT: I see this was discussed in another thread.
|
2 |
\n
|
3 |
\n
|
3 |
That having been said...
|
4 |
That having been said...
|
4 |
\n
|
5 |
\n
|
5 |
I think you are misinterpreting @Anir's position. In team games we do not insist that everybody plays 100% tryhard all of the time but we do insist that they make something along the lines of a good-faith attempt to play to their win condition (as opposed to griefing their team and assisting the opposing team's win condition). This is a necessary pre-requisite for the game being fun for all involved, which is our primary motivation.
|
6 |
I think you are misinterpreting @Anir's position. In team games we do not insist that everybody plays 100% tryhard all of the time but we do insist that they make something along the lines of a good-faith attempt to play to their win condition (as opposed to griefing their team and assisting the opposing team's win condition). This is a necessary pre-requisite for the game being fun for all involved, which is our primary motivation.
|
6 |
[spoiler]I'm not going to attempt to define exactly what "good-faith" means here. Would probably drag this thread off-topic.[/spoiler]
|
7 |
[spoiler]I'm not going to attempt to define exactly what "good-faith" means here. Would probably drag this thread off-topic.[/spoiler]
|
7 |
\n
|
8 |
\n
|
8 |
In FFA games @Anir is saying, and I generally agree, that more or less the same thing applies. You don't have to tryhard but you do have to be playing in a way that lines up with making *yourself* win the *current* game. The difference is that in FFA it is much easier to talk yourself into thinking assisting one particular opponent to win is OK, because they are not your only opponent. Nevertheless if people routinely do this it makes a mockery of the game and results in less fun for everybody (else) involved.
|
9 |
In FFA games @Anir is saying, and I generally agree, that more or less the same thing applies. You don't have to tryhard but you do have to be playing in a way that lines up with making *yourself* win the *current* game. The difference is that in FFA it is much easier to talk yourself into thinking assisting one particular opponent to win is OK, because they are not your only opponent. Nevertheless if people routinely do this it makes a mockery of the game and results in less fun for everybody (else) involved.
|
9 |
\n
|
10 |
\n
|
10 |
\n
|
11 |
\n
|
11 |
tl;dr: playing some meme unit composition in FFA is okay, perhaps even more ok than in teams because you're only letting yourself down, but helping *specific* other players to win at the expense of yourself and the rest of the players is not okay
|
12 |
tl;dr: playing some meme unit composition in FFA is okay, perhaps even more ok than in teams because you're only letting yourself down, but helping *specific* other players to win at the expense of yourself and the rest of the players is not okay
|
12 |
\n
|
13 |
\n
|