Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

Anir’s Guide on Free for All (FFA) – Games

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
12/20/2021 10:03:02 PMAUrankAdminAquanim before revert after revert
12/20/2021 10:02:16 PMAUrankAdminAquanim before revert after revert
Before After
1 [quote]an I assume this does NOT mean that if you've promised something like "Let's team on this guy till we've taken out his expansion here" and then later information arrives that makes this a losing play you are obliged to backstab them? e.g. I can value keeping my promises over winning the current game.[/quote] 1 [quote]an I assume this does NOT mean that if you've promised something like "Let's team on this guy till we've taken out his expansion here" and then later information arrives that makes this a losing play you are obliged to backstab them? e.g. I can value keeping my promises over winning the current game.[/quote]
2 In an ideal world where everybody playing FFA actually has some understanding of the game mode, I think that nobody (including yourself) should expect you to keep a promise that is obviously gamelosing, and breaking it should do no harm to your reputation. It helps if you phrase your agreements as "lets not fight for now" as opposed to "peace forever". 2 In an ideal world where everybody playing FFA actually has some understanding of the game mode, I think that nobody (including yourself) should expect you to keep a promise that is obviously gamelosing, and breaking it should do no harm to your reputation. It helps if you phrase your agreements as "lets not fight for now" as opposed to "peace forever".
3 \n 3 \n
4 If the players in a FFA have mutual respect (i.e. they expect their ally to do the sensible thing and backstab them when it is clearly a good idea to do so, and hence are not offended by it) pretty much any agreement is understood to be temporary by default. 4 If the players in a FFA have mutual respect (i.e. they expect their ally to do the sensible thing and backstab them when it is clearly a good idea to do so, and hence are not offended by it) pretty much any agreement is understood to be temporary by default.
5 \n 5 \n
6 However this is not an ideal world. If it is *blindingly* obvious that by keeping this promise you are tanking both your own chance to win and that of the person you are attacking in favour of the person you made the promise to, I think playing this way is in pretty poor taste. If it is less than blindingly obvious then it's hard to call it anything worse than a misjudgement. It is hard to imagine the moderators feeling it is their business in either case though. 6 However this is not an ideal world. If it is *blindingly* obvious that by keeping this promise you are tanking both your own chance to win and that of the person you are attacking in favour of the person you made the promise to, I think playing this way is in pretty poor taste. If it is less than blindingly obvious then it's hard to call it anything worse than a misjudgement. It is hard to imagine the moderators feeling it is their business in either case though.
7 \n 7 \n
8 See for example [url=https://wiki.starsautohost.org/wiki/%22SLDS_1:_%22I%27ll_Kill_You_Last%22_by_Scott_Phelps_1997_Any]this article[/url] written about FFA in some other game (it is part of a series on FFA diplomacy that is worth reading). 8 See for example [url=https://wiki.starsautohost.org/wiki/%22SLDS_1:_%22I%27ll_Kill_You_Last%22_by_Scott_Phelps_1997_Any]this article[/url] written about FFA in some other game (it is part of a series on FFA diplomacy that is worth reading).
9 \n 9 \n
10 -- 10 --
11 \n 11 \n
12 As for the other, I don't recall handing out a *final* warning as an immediate prelude to formal modaction that was not clearly signalled in some way or another as a moderator action, and getting all formal about warnings earlier than that seems counterproductive a lot of the time. Neither I nor anybody else has to use or even possess moderator powers to remind others not to be a dick. 12 As for the other, I don't recall handing out a *final* warning as an immediate prelude to formal modaction that was not clearly signalled in some way or another as a moderator action ( depending on your definition of clearly signalled I am sure some example could be found. but moving on. . . ) , and getting all formal about warnings earlier than that seems counterproductive a lot of the time. Neither I nor anybody else has to use or even possess moderator powers to remind others not to be a dick.