| 1 |
Also
|
1 |
Also
|
| 2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
| 3 |
[q] I've lost count of how many times some iteration of mandatory tutorial idea was proposed, but this one takes the cake by the tutorial being imposed by a lynch mob. [/q]
|
3 |
[q] I've lost count of how many times some iteration of mandatory tutorial idea was proposed, but this one takes the cake by the tutorial being imposed by a lynch mob. [/q]
|
| 4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
| 5 |
The
current
state
of
things
is
that
a
single
player
can
derail
games
to
the
point
where
everyone
just
leaves
the
lobpot.
Kicks
aren't
allowed
for
new
players
and
reporting
apparently
does
nothing.
|
5 |
The
current
state
of
things
is
that
a
single
player
can
derail
games
to
the
point
where
everyone
just
leaves
the
lobpot.
Kicks
aren't
allowed
for
new
players
and
reporting
does
nothing.
It
really
feels
like
there
needs
to
be
*something*
in
between.
|
| 6 |
\n
|
6 |
\n
|
| 7 |
When ten people complain, game after game over weeks about a single person, maybe it makes sense to find a fix.
|
7 |
When ten people complain, game after game over weeks about a single person, maybe it makes sense to find a fix.
|
| 8 |
\n
|
8 |
\n
|
| 9 |
Mind you, I never actually gave any specifics about how to implement this, so I'm not sure why this would necessarily need to be a "lynch mob" (who needs principle of charity anyway). For example, one way to implement this would be to have the votes forwarded to a mod if it goes over 10. That way we have mod discretion rather than mob discretion.
|
9 |
Mind you, I never actually gave any specifics about how to implement this, so I'm not sure why this would necessarily need to be a "lynch mob" (who needs principle of charity anyway). For example, one way to implement this would be to have the votes forwarded to a mod if it goes over 10. That way we have mod discretion rather than mob discretion.
|
Alternative to kicking new players: tutorial voting