| 1 |
[quote]Wow, I did NOT expect to discover that the reason casual ladder has lower elo than MM is FFA. :o[/quote]
|
1 |
[quote]Wow, I did NOT expect to discover that the reason casual ladder has lower elo than MM is FFA. :o[/quote]
|
| 2 |
The top of the currently active ladder still has considerably higher MM ratings... but the currently inactive Godde has current casual rating in the 3600s.
|
2 |
The top of the currently active ladder still has considerably higher MM ratings... but the currently inactive Godde has current casual rating in the 3600s.
|
| 3 |
\n
|
3 |
\n
|
| 4 |
I'm
not
sure
what
higher
or
lower
rating
points
compared
between
two
separate
WHR
systems
actually
means,
though.
|
4 |
I'm
not
sure
what
higher
or
lower
rating
points
compared
between
two
separate
WHR
systems
actually
means,
though.
It
may
mean
something,
it
may
not.
I
guess
I
could
imagine
that
FFA
is
more
"random
noise"
than
even
teams,
which
caused
the
system
to
be
less
confident
in
predictions
across
the
board.
|
| 5 |
\n
|
5 |
\n
|
| 6 |
[quote]This could do awful things to lobsterpot balance for those who've gained 400 elo like me...[/quote]
|
6 |
[quote]This could do awful things to lobsterpot balance for those who've gained 400 elo like me...[/quote]
|
| 7 |
Four hundred is on the high side I think, but gaining several hundred rating points seems to be the rule for most players rather than the exception. So I expect the impact to not be extreme.
|
7 |
Four hundred is on the high side I think, but gaining several hundred rating points seems to be the rule for most players rather than the exception. So I expect the impact to not be extreme.
|
FFA games and rating