3 |
Right,
I
get
you
now.
I
was
suggesting
a
concurrent
version
of
the
lobby.
So
you'd
essentially
have
1v1
ranked,
teams
ranked,
(
ffa
ranked
but
not
part
of
the
scope
of
this
post,
definitely
ideal
though)
,
and
then
the
unranked
equivelant
of
all
of
the
above.
It
was
more
an
"in
addition
to"
than
an
"instead
of".
Sorry
if
the
wording
wasn't
quite
there.
|
3 |
Right,
I
get
you
now.
I
was
suggesting
a
concurrent
version
of
the
lobby.
So
you'd
essentially
have
1v1
ranked,
teams
ranked,
(
ffa
ranked
but
not
part
of
the
scope
of
this
post,
definitely
ideal
though)
,
and
then
the
unranked
equivelant
of
all
of
the
above.
It
was
more
an
"in
addition
to"
than
an
"instead
of".
Sorry
if
the
wording
wasn't
quite
there.
I
think
we
might
want
the
same
things.
|