| 1 |
[q]You cannot simply do that. Any team game on record has been balanced using 1v1 games and cannot be separated from 1v1 games, team games that were not balanced at all are the only relevant available sample. [/q]
|
1 |
[q]You cannot simply do that. Any team game on record has been balanced using 1v1 games and cannot be separated from 1v1 games, team games that were not balanced at all are the only relevant available sample. [/q]
|
| 2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
| 3 |
It seems like you think that at least one of these is true:
|
3 |
It seems like you think that at least one of these is true:
|
| 4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
| 5 |
- the dataset includes the ranks used to balance the historical games and they are being used in this evaluation
|
5 |
- the dataset includes the ranks used to balance the historical games and they are being used in this evaluation
|
| 6 |
- the two (actually more) disparate algorithms used to balance and predict games back when they were played actually somehow influence the new algorithm despite numbers being not used
|
6 |
- the two (actually more) disparate algorithms used to balance and predict games back when they were played actually somehow influence the new algorithm despite numbers being not used
|
| 7 |
\n
|
7 |
\n
|
| 8 |
If
it's
the
former,
you
would
be
[i]simply[/i]
wrong.
If
it's
the
latter,
then
you
have
to
demonstrate
how
you
think
this
influence
would
happen.
If
it's
none
of
the
above,
then
please
clarify.
|
8 |
If
it's
the
former,
you
would
be
[i]simply[/i]
wrong.
If
it's
the
latter,
then
you
have
to
demonstrate
how
you
think
this
influence
would
happen.
It
sounds
frankly
pretty
much
an
extraordinary
claim,
but
i'm
sure
you
have
extraordinary
mathematical
proof
to
back
it
up,
if
so.
|
|
|
9 |
\n
|
|
|
10 |
If it's none of the above, then please clarify.
|
Do 1v1 games improve multiplayer balance