1 |
Trying to figure out why it seems so difficult for you to get how this works - and clicking on @Brackman 's link from above- i found this:
|
1 |
Trying to figure out why it seems so difficult for you to get how this works - and clicking on @Brackman 's link from above- i found this:
|
2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
3 |
[q] I'm not talking about the specifics of how it is implemented, but rather how using old data doesn't provide a valid point for effectiveness of new implementations. Since the data is not related to it.[/q]
|
3 |
[q] I'm not talking about the specifics of how it is implemented, but rather how using old data doesn't provide a valid point for effectiveness of new implementations. Since the data is not related to it.[/q]
|
4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
5 |
Would
you
perhaps
claim
that
a
series
of
games
balanced
[i]entirely
randomly[/i]
then
cannot
be
evaluated
by
[u]any[/u]
ranking
system,
since
they
all
attempt
to
be
very
non-random?
|
5 |
Would
you
perhaps
claim
that
different-skilled
players
in
a
series
of
games
balanced
[i]entirely
randomly[/i]
then
cannot
be
evaluated
by
[u]any[/u]
ranking
system,
since
they
all
attempt
to
be
very
non-random?
|