1 |
[q]I made no such claim as that makes no sense to claim. Where do you have a dataset featuring these randomly balanced games? [/q]
|
1 |
[q]I made no such claim as that makes no sense to claim. Where do you have a dataset featuring these randomly balanced games? [/q]
|
2 |
Then your claims are mutually exclusive.
|
2 |
Then your claims are mutually exclusive.
|
3 |
\n
|
3 |
\n
|
4 |
- You say that it's nonsensical to claim that a randomly-balanced dataset cannot be used to evaluate players.
|
4 |
- You say that it's nonsensical to claim that a randomly-balanced dataset cannot be used to evaluate players.
|
5 |
\n
|
5 |
\n
|
6 |
- You say that it's invalid to evaluate whether a subset of a dataset balanced using (elo, whr, and all games) increases or decreases predictivity of trueskill, because these games were balanced using elo and whr over all games and not using trueskill over only-teams.
|
6 |
- You say that it's invalid to evaluate whether a subset of a dataset balanced using (elo, whr, and all games) increases or decreases predictivity of trueskill, because these games were balanced using elo and whr over all games and not using trueskill over only-teams.
|
7 |
\n
|
7 |
\n
|
8 |
[tooltip=Well,
a
person
who
actually
understands
the
subject
matter
cannot.
Evidently
_you_
can!]You
can't
have
both.
[/tooltip]
|
8 |
You
can't
have
both.
|