| 1 |
[q] In big team games I like to rush to front with jumpycom... If you arrive first at a supermex you faced with a nasty choice, do i build def or mex? [/q]
|
1 |
[q] In big team games I like to rush to front with jumpycom... If you arrive first at a supermex you faced with a nasty choice, do i build def or mex? [/q]
|
| 2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
| 3 |
I also usually rush super-mexes, in my exp it does not matter as for some reason I usually face around 3 full enemy-armies while my allies are just starting to move - if I am lucky - forward.
|
3 |
I also usually rush super-mexes, in my exp it does not matter as for some reason I usually face around 3 full enemy-armies while my allies are just starting to move - if I am lucky - forward.
|
| 4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
| 5 |
[q] Just gotta get players to play a few 1v1 and then you "feel" it, no research even required. [/q]
|
5 |
[q] Just gotta get players to play a few 1v1 and then you "feel" it, no research even required. [/q]
|
| 6 |
\n
|
6 |
\n
|
| 7 |
Agree, now look at how many players have an mm-rating...
|
7 |
Agree, now look at how many players have an mm-rating...
|
|
|
8 |
\n
|
|
|
9 |
[q] Get your mex refund/investment back right away, after that the mex gets socialized so serve us all :-) [/q]
|
|
|
10 |
\n
|
|
|
11 |
I am in support of this actually, I am just very uncertain if it has an effect on player-behaviour (and if it has one that it is a pure positive one). In your super-mex-example it would not help too much tho; what you lack is mostly the TIME. Even if the mex pays of directly, you might simply not get any meaningful defenses up fast enough.
|
|
|
12 |
Anyway, as said, atm I am in support of this proposal, but someone might easily change my mind.
|
End Communism?