Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

Opinions on bar rts?

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
1/16/2023 12:21:22 AMNLrankMSPR before revert after revert
1/16/2023 12:20:59 AMNLrankMSPR before revert after revert
1/16/2023 12:17:46 AMNLrankMSPR before revert after revert
Before After
1 But games do scale up beyond 'a few units dueling it out'. It's only not true if you pick a lobpot of too many players on a too small map. 1 But games do scale up beyond 'a few units dueling it out'. It's only not true if you pick a lobpot of too many players on a too small map.
2 \n 2 \n
3 I also find it very hard to believe 50% communism was in any way better. Maybe you're romanticizing the past a bit. 3 I also find it very hard to believe 50% communism was in any way better. Maybe you're romanticizing the past a bit.
4 \n 4 \n
5 It would be an absolute drag to share less; you would have people only interested in investing in eco and then saying 'I'm done eco, let's attack' and then they build their hundreds of units. It sounds like hell. 5 It would be an absolute drag to share less; you would have people only interested in investing in eco and then saying 'I'm done eco, let's attack' and then they build their hundreds of units. It sounds like hell.
6 \n 6 \n
7 Or do you also profit from expanding. My mexes - my metal. COMMUNISM BAD then. 7 Or do you also profit from expanding. My mexes - my metal. COMMUNISM BAD then.
8 \n 8 \n
9 BAR IS BUSTLING and REDOLENT. Last and current opinion. 9 BAR is BUSTLING AND REDOLENT. Last and current opinion.