1 |
@manero @malric
|
1 |
@manero @malric
|
2 |
Gosh,
using
a
nitpick
example
to
extrapolate
your
cause,
all
inorder
to
fulfill
your
personal
preference.
Furthermore,
your
argument
is
easy
to
rebut,
for
those
who
want
play
team
game
that
exceed
24
or
whatever
now
are
forced
to
wait
potentially
hours
due
to
your
approach.
You
are
not
inclusive
by
any
means
but
rather
disguising
a
personal
preference
as
benefit
for
the
community
at
large.
|
2 |
Gosh,
using
a
nitpick
example
to
extrapolate
your
cause,
just
to
reach
your
goal
of
fulfilling
your
personal
preference.
Furthermore,
your
argument
is
easy
to
rebut,
for
those
who
want
play
team
game
that
exceed
24
or
whatever
now
are
forced
to
wait
potentially
hours
due
to
your
approach.
You
are
not
inclusive
by
any
means
but
rather
disguising
a
personal
preference
as
benefit
for
the
community
at
large.
|
3 |
\n
|
3 |
\n
|
4 |
Your personal preference is not any more important than others. If you don't like big team, go join the small team and advertise them. Don't go forcing others to play by your preferences. The world does not revolve around you.
|
4 |
Your personal preference is not any more important than others. If you don't like big team, go join the small team and advertise them. Don't go forcing others to play by your preferences. The world does not revolve around you.
|
5 |
\n
|
5 |
\n
|
6 |
Like I have said to @dyth68, if the small team is a majority preference, what is so hard to fulfill a small teams? There should be tons of people willing to join the team without needing to force them to.
|
6 |
Like I have said to @dyth68, if the small team is a majority preference, what is so hard to fulfill a small teams? There should be tons of people willing to join the team without needing to force them to.
|
7 |
\n
|
7 |
\n
|
8 |
To confine others to your preferences is always morally wrong, regardless how much you selflessly want to.
|
8 |
To confine others to your preferences is always morally wrong, regardless how much you selflessly want to.
|