| 1 |
Well.. hmmmmmmmmmm:
|
1 |
Well.. hmmmmmmmmmm:
|
| 2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
| 3 |
@Evolox 's recent games
|
3 |
@Evolox 's recent games
|
| 4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
| 5 |
@B1643031
|
5 |
@B1643031
|
| 6 |
@B1643029
|
6 |
@B1643029
|
| 7 |
@B1643017
|
7 |
@B1643017
|
| 8 |
@B1643012
|
8 |
@B1643012
|
| 9 |
@B1642802
|
9 |
@B1642802
|
| 10 |
@B1642776
|
10 |
@B1642776
|
| 11 |
@B1642105
|
11 |
@B1642105
|
| 12 |
@B1642081
|
12 |
@B1642081
|
| 13 |
@B1642051
|
13 |
@B1642051
|
| 14 |
@B1641063
|
14 |
@B1641063
|
| 15 |
\n
|
15 |
\n
|
| 16 |
----
|
16 |
----
|
| 17 |
@Baljeety1 's recent games
|
17 |
@Baljeety1 's recent games
|
| 18 |
\n
|
18 |
\n
|
| 19 |
@B1643031
|
19 |
@B1643031
|
| 20 |
@B1643029
|
20 |
@B1643029
|
| 21 |
@B1643017
|
21 |
@B1643017
|
| 22 |
@B1643012
|
22 |
@B1643012
|
| 23 |
@B1642802
|
23 |
@B1642802
|
| 24 |
\n
|
24 |
\n
|
| 25 |
----
|
25 |
----
|
| 26 |
@Merxcy's previous games:
|
26 |
@Merxcy's previous games:
|
| 27 |
\n
|
27 |
\n
|
| 28 |
@B1642400 -- Banned from ZK after this.
|
28 |
@B1642400 -- Banned from ZK after this.
|
| 29 |
@B1642393
|
29 |
@B1642393
|
| 30 |
@B1642105
|
30 |
@B1642105
|
| 31 |
@B1642081
|
31 |
@B1642081
|
| 32 |
@B1641063
|
32 |
@B1641063
|
| 33 |
@B1640966
|
33 |
@B1640966
|
| 34 |
@B1637804
|
34 |
@B1637804
|
| 35 |
@B1637778
|
35 |
@B1637778
|
| 36 |
@B1637236
|
36 |
@B1637236
|
| 37 |
\n
|
37 |
\n
|
| 38 |
[url=http://zero-k.
info/Battles?UserId=554972]HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM[/url].
I
don't
know
how
@Aquanim
came
to
this
conclusion
at
all.
|
38 |
[url=http://zero-k.
info/Battles?UserId=554972]HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM[/url].
I
don't
know
how
@Aquanim
came
to
this
conclusion
at
all.
Seriously,
this
is
blatant
af
by
just
the
recent
games,
let
alone
any
of
the
more
technical
side
of
how
smurfs
are
detected.
This
is
to
say
this
entire
post
makes
you
look
kind
of
dumb.
Like
this
is
a
tight
nit
group
of
5
people
where
suddenly
a
new
guy
on
a
fresh
account
gets
added
or
guesses
a
password.
That
crap
doesn't
happen.
It's
because
it
is
this
blatant
(
along
with
the
need
to
keep
how
the
backend
sauce
is
made)
that
you
didn't
get
an
answer.
|
| 39 |
\n
|
39 |
\n
|
| 40 |
[spoiler]Look at the replays. This is a tight nit group of 5, where one member got banned and tried to smurf to evade the ban and [b]IMMEDIATELY[/b] rejoined the group. There is no need to explain the technical analysis that @Aquanim did when it is [b]THIS[/b] blatant. Either @Baljeety1 quickly befriended @Logix, @Evolox, @Kumuhana, and @mattp to get into their private games or @Baljeety1 == @Merxcy and you can ocram's razor that one pretty easily. I bet if you even watch the replays you'll see the same exact play style too.[/spoiler]
|
|
|
Baljeety1 banned??