Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

tank constructor

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
8/28/2023 9:52:49 PMNOrankskuggmodzer0 before revert after revert
8/28/2023 9:51:15 PMNOrankskuggmodzer0 before revert after revert
Before After
1 [quote]Would need to be all terrain[/quote] 1 [quote]Would need to be all terrain[/quote]
2 Would it? I had really been thinking minotaur (or cyclops) mobility. No climbing cliffs, no ninja hiding on the backside of spikes, no building cannons in crazy places, but the potential to cover ground and exploit opportunities under fire. 2 Would it? I had really been thinking minotaur (or cyclops) mobility. No climbing cliffs, no ninja hiding on the backside of spikes, no building cannons in crazy places, but the potential to cover ground and exploit opportunities under fire.
3 \n 3 \n
4 [quote]Would it be more or less expensive?[/quote] 4 [quote]Would it be more or less expensive?[/quote]
5 Well, in the crude thought experiment I had going, it would be [i]exactly[/i] like a minotaur with one cannon barrel swapped. I like that in several ways. For one, choosing which to build is a decision about a single variable. For another, it seemed appealing that the minotaur and this other beast could run around together, if desired, without any extra micro overhead. 5 Well, in the crude thought experiment I had going, it would be [i]exactly[/i] like a minotaur with one cannon barrel swapped. I like that in several ways. For one, choosing which to build is a decision about a single variable. For another, it seemed appealing that the minotaur and this other beast could run around together, if desired, without any extra micro overhead.
6 \n 6 \n
7 I suppose the real truth is that it comes down to balance. Losing half the firepower is a big deal, but I don't doubt there exist niches it would be worth it. Are there un-fun ways this could be used, spammy things? 7 I suppose the real truth is that it comes down to balance. Losing half the firepower is a big deal, but I don't doubt there exist niches it would be worth it. Are there un-fun ways this could be used, spammy things?
8 \n 8 \n
9 I could see them used as a meat-wall around a friendly paladin. Seemed OK, given their weaknesses ( i. e. glaives would eat them) . They could perhaps do raiding where they set up a cluster of turrets inside enemy territory. Meh? 9 I could see them used as a meat-wall around a friendly paladin. Seemed OK, given their weaknesses ( i. e. glaives would eat them) . They could perhaps do raiding where they set up a cluster of turrets inside enemy territory. Meh? A lot of reclaim under fire. Generally running around doings no other construction unit would dare attempt.