| 1 |
[quote]the result will be that everyone who isnt fulfilling the requirments will be kicked[/quote]
|
1 |
[quote]the result will be that everyone who isnt fulfilling the requirments will be kicked[/quote]
|
| 2 |
Emulating a rating/rank limit, [b]in the main active teams room[/b], by kicking everybody who does not meet that limit is modactionable and has been modactioned in the past.
|
2 |
Emulating a rating/rank limit, [b]in the main active teams room[/b], by kicking everybody who does not meet that limit is modactionable and has been modactioned in the past.
|
| 3 |
\n
|
3 |
\n
|
| 4 |
[quote]also how is "arbitary" a fitting description[/quote]
|
4 |
[quote]also how is "arbitary" a fitting description[/quote]
|
| 5 |
The room boss could tune the rating/rank limits as the room changes to have fairly fine control over who they include and exclude. Sounds pretty arbitrary to me.
|
5 |
The room boss could tune the rating/rank limits as the room changes to have fairly fine control over who they include and exclude. Sounds pretty arbitrary to me.
|
| 6 |
\n
|
6 |
\n
|
| 7 |
[quote]you cant create a room to play how you want?[/quote]
|
7 |
[quote]you cant create a room to play how you want?[/quote]
|
| 8 |
You can create a small teams room to play how you want. Since it is typically only viable to have one large teams room running at any one time (and it is not unlikely to be the only PvP option available) the moderators insist that it remain open to new players.
|
8 |
You can create a small teams room to play how you want. Since it is typically only viable to have one large teams room running at any one time (and it is not unlikely to be the only PvP option available) the moderators insist that it remain open to new players.
|
| 9 |
\n
|
9 |
\n
|
| 10 |
[quote]How will it be the dominant room if only 5-10% of the player base even qualify to be in it[/quote]
|
10 |
[quote]How will it be the dominant room if only 5-10% of the player base even qualify to be in it[/quote]
|
| 11 |
The rating/rank limits do not have to be set in such a way.
|
11 |
The rating/rank limits do not have to be set in such a way.
|
| 12 |
\n
|
12 |
\n
|
| 13 |
I am not going to go so far as to say that "nothing you say will change admin policy on this topic". But I think you would have to convince us that current admin policy was failing to meet [b]our[/b] objectives. The rules exist because we observed bad behaviour and had to make up rules to prevent it, so do not expect the convincing to be easy. Complaining about how much this policy annoys you personally is very unlikely to move the needle. It certainly did not do so the last N times this conversation was had.
|
13 |
I am not going to go so far as to say that "nothing you say will change admin policy on this topic". But I think you would have to convince us that current admin policy was failing to meet [b]our[/b] objectives. The rules exist because we observed bad behaviour and had to make up rules to prevent it, so do not expect the convincing to be easy. Complaining about how much this policy annoys you personally is very unlikely to move the needle. It certainly did not do so the last N times this conversation was had.
|
| 14 |
\n
|
14 |
\n
|
| 15 |
The
above
having
been
said,
we
do
run
the
Platinum/Palladium
room
sometimes
as
an
autohost,
and
I
would
be
open
to
changing
exactly
how
it
is
configured
on
request.
It
seems
to
work
better
when
somebody
is
organising
a
specific
time
for
people
to
show
up,
and
that
has
not
been
done
recently.
Somebody
could
step
up
again
for
this.
I
am
not
awake
at
peak
activity
hours
so
it
is
not
going
to
be
me.
|
15 |
The
above
having
been
said,
we
do
run
the
Platinum/Palladium
room
sometimes
as
an
autohost,
and
I
would
be
open
to
changing
its
configuration
on
request.
It
seems
to
work
better
when
somebody
is
organising
a
specific
time
for
people
to
show
up,
and
that
has
not
been
done
recently.
Somebody
could
step
up
again
for
this.
I
am
not
awake
at
peak
activity
hours
so
it
is
not
going
to
be
me.
|
Why did they do it and why can't it be turned off?