Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

Why did they do it and why can't it be turned off?

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
9/1/2023 1:01:07 PMDErankkatastrophe before revert after revert
9/1/2023 12:57:37 PMDErankkatastrophe before revert after revert
Before After
1 @aioeieoiao 1 @aioeieoiao
2 \n 2 \n
3 Sadly we have that conflict for as long as I am here, and so far noone found a solution that would make both parties ( low and high ranked players) happy. I totally understand why one would want to have personal elo-restricted rooms, but the playerbase is so small that it simply is not possible without harm for zk as a whole, as stupid as that sounds. Anyway, if you have a good idea how both sides could be equally satisfied, don`t hesitate to share it. We really need it. 3 Sadly we have that conflict for as long as I am here, and so far noone found a solution that would make both parties ( low and high ranked players) happy. I totally understand why one would want to have personal elo-restricted rooms - I have essentially made the same thread a few years ago - but the playerbase is so small that it simply is not possible without harm for zk as a whole, as stupid as that sounds. Anyway, if you have a good idea how both sides could be equally satisfied, don`t hesitate to share it. We really need it.
4 \n 4 \n
5 \n 5 \n
6 \n 6 \n
7 @Aquanim 7 @Aquanim
8 \n 8 \n
9 [q] But I think you would have to convince us that current admin policy was failing to meet our objectives. [/q] 9 [q] But I think you would have to convince us that current admin policy was failing to meet our objectives. [/q]
10 \n 10 \n
11 If at least one of your objectives is to create a community with good climate, then this: 11 If at least one of your objectives is to create a community with good climate, then this:
12 \n 12 \n
13 [q] Complaining about how much this policy annoys you personally is very unlikely to move the needle. [/q] 13 [q] Complaining about how much this policy annoys you personally is very unlikely to move the needle. [/q]
14 \n 14 \n
15 is definitely not helpful. Why? Because you are saying: "We value other people a lot more than you." 15 is definitely not helpful. Why? Because you are saying: "We value other people a lot more than you."
16 16
17 [q] It certainly did not do so the last N times this conversation was had. [/q] 17 [q] It certainly did not do so the last N times this conversation was had. [/q]
18 \n 18 \n
19 Maybe we have this conversation at least once a year because the topic is actually important for many people. And it is not the same people every time. @aioeieoiao is what I would consider a "new old player" that had virtually no engagement with the forum so far. 19 Maybe we have this conversation at least once a year because the topic is actually important for many people. And it is not the same people every time. @aioeieoiao is what I would consider a "new old player" that had virtually no engagement with the forum so far.
20 \n 20 \n
21 I don`t say that you have to give in. I want to say that it would be in your own interest to sound less disparaging to community members that afaik have no history of bad behaviour. (And to be clear, if the initial comment was somthing like "WTF nazi-admins on it again" the situation would be massively different.) Because honestly, I understand the problem and want to support your agenda, but reading this is really infuriating. As a third party that considers themselves as allied with you! 21 I don`t say that you have to give in. I want to say that it would be in your own interest to sound less disparaging to community members that afaik have no history of bad behaviour. (And to be clear, if the initial comment was somthing like "WTF nazi-admins on it again" the situation would be massively different.) Because honestly, I understand the problem and want to support your agenda, but reading this is really infuriating. As a third party that considers themselves as allied with you!
22 \n 22 \n
23 We have enough drama-threads initiated by trolls already, we don`t need additional ones that one could potentially prevent with a bit more empathic communication. 23 We have enough drama-threads initiated by trolls already, we don`t need additional ones that one could potentially prevent with a bit more empathic communication.
24 \n 24 \n
25 \n 25 \n