Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

Why did they do it and why can't it be turned off?

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
9/1/2023 11:21:31 PMAUrankAdminAquanim before revert after revert
Before After
1 [quote]Do you think it would be feasible to show to players only rooms they satisfy the ELO limit[/quote] 1 [quote]Do you think it would be feasible to show to players only rooms they satisfy the ELO limit[/quote]
2 People can still spectate a game they are not eligible to play in. So I would prefer not to do this. Also... 2 People can still spectate a game they are not eligible to play in. So I would prefer not to do this. Also...
3 \n 3 \n
4 [quote]do you think that would solve the issues described here[/quote] 4 [quote]do you think that would solve the issues described here[/quote]
5 I do not think "newbies think the game is dead, so they leave" is much of an improvement on "newbies see the veterans are deliberately excluding them, so they leave". 5 I do not think "newbies think the game is dead, so they leave" is much of an improvement on "newbies see the veterans are deliberately excluding them, so they leave".
6 \n 6 \n
7 [quote]my friends don't count towards the "min players for this to be the big teams room" limit[/quote] 7 [quote]my friends don't count towards the "min players for this to be the big teams room" limit[/quote]
8 I think this has more to do with what else is going on in the server. If there is some 24 player game going on elsewhere then you can do more than if your room is the only thing going. 8 I think this has more to do with what else is going on in the server. If there is some 24 player game going on elsewhere then you can do more than if your room is the only thing going.
9 \n 9 \n
10 If you are running a game for mostly you and your friends, we would much prefer you arbitrarily include people with a password rather than arbitrarily exclude people. 10 If you are running a game for mostly you and your friends, we would much prefer you arbitrarily include people with a password rather than arbitrarily exclude people.
11 \n 11 \n
12 [quote]turn it into an FFA, make it chickens[/quote] 12 [quote]turn it into an FFA, make it chickens[/quote]
13 I don't think there is an explicit rule against this even if you are running the "main room". I don't see a concrete need for one since if most of the players in your room are there to play teams this is a problem that will fix itself. 13 I don't think there is an explicit rule against this even if you are running the "main room". I don't see a concrete need for one since if most of the players in your room are there to play teams this is a problem that will fix itself. I could be wrong.