1 |
[q] A few observations to compare artemis to other turrets:[/q]
|
1 |
[q] A few observations to compare artemis to other turrets:[/q]
|
2 |
Note that if you compare aircraft stats with ground units using this methodology, they will appear just as absurd.
|
2 |
Note that if you compare aircraft stats with ground units using this methodology, they will appear just as absurd.
|
3 |
\n
|
3 |
\n
|
4 |
Unfortunately, this seems to be a large part of ZK's design for the concept of aircraft: strategically OP units (mainly due to their immense speed and alpha) that are only counterable with a special magical weapon type that is simultaneously useless against anything else.
|
4 |
Unfortunately, this seems to be a large part of ZK's design for the concept of aircraft: strategically OP units (mainly due to their immense speed and alpha) that are only counterable with a special magical weapon type that is simultaneously useless against anything else.
|
5 |
\n
|
5 |
\n
|
6 |
I don't think this can change. ZK is a mature game and this aspect of its design is embedded way too deep.
|
6 |
I don't think this can change. ZK is a mature game and this aspect of its design is embedded way too deep.
|
7 |
\n
|
7 |
\n
|
8 |
---
|
8 |
---
|
9 |
\n
|
9 |
\n
|
10 |
\n
|
10 |
\n
|
11 |
The part with "simultaneously useless against anything else" suggests the counter for Artemis: it's a single point of failure, highly expensive device, that covers a huge area. It also can't run and it can't fight against land targts. Surely your ground units should be able to sneak, streak, or otherwise strike at it.
|
11 |
The part with "simultaneously useless against anything else" suggests the counter for Artemis: it's a single point of failure, highly expensive device, that covers a huge area. It also can't run and it can't fight against land targts. Surely your ground units should be able to sneak, streak, or otherwise strike at it.
|
12 |
\n
|
12 |
\n
|
|
|
13 |
Scythes, or skuttles, or a mob of cloaked ravagers, whatever.
|
|
|
14 |
\n
|
13 |
But of course you will counter that no, not in a 16v16 lobpot where the front is fully porced, the rear is porced, and artemis itself is porced, and some lob built a secondary artemis behind the first because they like building artemises in a row.
|
15 |
But of course you will counter that no, not in a 16v16 lobpot where the front is fully porced, the rear is porced, and artemis itself is porced, and some lob built a secondary artemis behind the first because they like building artemises in a row.
|
14 |
\n
|
16 |
\n
|
15 |
Well, there's your problem :P
|
17 |
Well, there's your problem :P
|
16 |
\n
|
18 |
\n
|
17 |
\n
|
19 |
\n
|