Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

NanoPirate (pls ban)

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
11/22/2023 11:34:29 PMUSrankVorpalkitty before revert after revert
11/22/2023 8:27:13 PMUSrankVorpalkitty before revert after revert
11/22/2023 8:26:59 PMUSrankVorpalkitty before revert after revert
Before After
1 Accusations of Nazism are unnecessary on the public forum I imagine, nor is it necessary to start insulting Nano for no reason. Now, I have [i]many[/i] gripes with Nano, which is why I have him ignored, but it's hardly fair to ask for a ban for him keeping his elo down. That's not far from being a 1-trick player, who can excel in teams that benefit their trick. 1 Accusations of Nazism are unnecessary on the public forum I imagine, nor is it necessary to start insulting Nano for no reason. Now, I have [i]many[/i] gripes with Nano, which is why I have him ignored, but it's hardly fair to ask for a ban for him keeping his elo down. That's not far from being a 1-trick player, who can excel in teams that benefit their trick.
2 \n 2 \n
3 I do, however, think that keeping one's elo down that far is exceptionally scummy, and ruins balance in anything smaller than a near-full lobpot, and I find that behavior unenjoyable for all involved, except perhaps Nano himself. 3 I do, however, think that keeping one's elo down that far is exceptionally scummy, and ruins balance in anything smaller than a near-full lobpot, and I find that behavior unenjoyable for all involved, except perhaps Nano himself.
4 \n 4 \n
5 [url=https://zero-k. info/Battles/Detail/1745489]https://zero-k. info/Battles/Detail/1430830[/url] 5 [url=https://zero-k. info/Battles/Detail/1745489]https://zero-k. info/Battles/Detail/1745489[/url]
6 [url=https://zero-k.info/Battles/Detail/1430830]https://zero-k.info/Battles/Detail/1430830[/url] 6 [url=https://zero-k.info/Battles/Detail/1430830]https://zero-k.info/Battles/Detail/1430830[/url]
7 \n 7 \n
8 Here are two games I played in, where I feel like Nano's deceptively low WHR ranking afforded the winning team an unfair advantage and ruined balance, seeing as they look like otherwise better games. 8 Here are two games I played in, where I feel like Nano's deceptively low WHR ranking afforded the winning team an unfair advantage and ruined balance, seeing as they look like otherwise better games.