Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

Replays of revenant not being OP

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
6/26/2024 7:23:30 AMAUrankAdminAquanim before revert after revert
6/26/2024 7:08:38 AMAUrankAdminAquanim before revert after revert
6/26/2024 7:08:18 AMAUrankAdminAquanim before revert after revert
6/26/2024 7:07:57 AMAUrankAdminAquanim before revert after revert
6/26/2024 7:05:46 AMAUrankAdminAquanim before revert after revert
6/26/2024 7:04:41 AMAUrankAdminAquanim before revert after revert
6/26/2024 7:02:42 AMAUrankAdminAquanim before revert after revert
Before After
1 I think I am going to have to insist that the part where running four bandits out into the path of the revenant rush seriously blunted it is 'valid' and relevant, regardless of what misplays occurred later. 1 I think I am going to have to insist that the part where running four bandits out into the path of the revenant rush seriously blunted it is 'valid' and relevant, regardless of what misplays occurred later.
2 \n 2 \n
3 In fact I would say after rewatching the replay that south team had a commanding lead in expansion and map control even before the Revenants were lost, [i]on account of the Revenant rush having failed to inflict enough damage[/i], and that the Revenants did not have a lot of scope to change that fact by raiding. So I don't think I agree with the premise at all. 3 In fact I would say after rewatching the replay that south team had a commanding lead in expansion and map control even before the Revenants were lost, at least partially [i]on account of the Revenant rush having failed to inflict enough damage[/i], and that the Revenants did not have a lot of scope to change that fact by raiding. So I don't think I agree with the premise at all.