| 1 |
@Trojaner_ and @cemahseri have been banned.
|
1 |
@Trojaner_ and @cemahseri have been banned.
|
| 2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
| 3 |
Reclaiming a friendly nanoframe is teamkilling.
|
3 |
Reclaiming a friendly nanoframe is teamkilling.
|
| 4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
| 5 |
(
I'm
not
really
interested
in
arguing
the
toss
on
whether
@cemahseri
technically
teamkilled.
Jumping
a
Skuttle
into
a
hole
with
a
friendly
Moho
demonstrates
clear
intent.
)
|
5 |
I'm
not
really
interested
in
arguing
the
toss
on
whether
@cemahseri
technically
teamkilled.
Jumping
a
Skuttle
into
a
hole
with
a
friendly
Moho
demonstrates
clear
intent.
|
| 6 |
\n
|
6 |
\n
|
| 7 |
That being said, placing a geo in a hole somebody else is terraforming is not a very polite thing to do.
|
7 |
That being said, placing a geo in a hole somebody else is terraforming is not a very polite thing to do.
|
| 8 |
[spoiler]I suppose who owns a geo makes a little more difference than most units, in that it determines (a) who gets the payback I think? and (b) who gets the privilege of sitting at the back and not contributing to the front while they put their resources into morphing it. However, I think the main way in which this is rude is that they may not have finished terraforming yet.[/spoiler]
|
8 |
[spoiler]I suppose who owns a geo makes a little more difference than most units, in that it determines (a) who gets the payback I think? and (b) who gets the privilege of sitting at the back and not contributing to the front while they put their resources into morphing it. However, I think the main way in which this is rude is that they may not have finished terraforming yet.[/spoiler]
|
| 9 |
It does not justify teamkilling, but nevertheless I would suggest you not repeat it.
|
9 |
It does not justify teamkilling, but nevertheless I would suggest you not repeat it.
|
B2087872 18 on Fields_Of_Isis (Multiplayer)