Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

Magpie is not countered by Ettin or at least any less than 4 Ettin

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
4/25/2025 6:00:07 AMAUrankSortale before revert after revert
4/25/2025 3:03:03 AMAUrankSortale before revert after revert
4/25/2025 3:00:30 AMAUrankSortale before revert after revert
4/25/2025 2:56:11 AMAUrankSortale before revert after revert
4/25/2025 2:54:48 AMAUrankSortale before revert after revert
4/25/2025 2:51:51 AMAUrankSortale before revert after revert
4/25/2025 2:50:01 AMAUrankSortale before revert after revert
4/25/2025 2:48:34 AMAUrankSortale before revert after revert
4/25/2025 2:47:51 AMAUrankSortale before revert after revert
4/25/2025 2:45:59 AMAUrankSortale before revert after revert
Before After
1 @Aquanim 1 @Aquanim
2 this set up was advantagous to ettin 2 this set up was advantagous to ettin
3 \n 3 \n
4 in fact since the AA builder have to take ground as well [pure AA doesn't hold ground either] you would have less AA than the air player have magpie, skewing the advantage to magpie player instead of parity as demonstrated here. 4 in fact since the AA builder have to take ground as well [pure AA doesn't hold ground either] you would have less AA than the air player have magpie, skewing the advantage to magpie player instead of parity as demonstrated here.
5 \n 5 \n
6 to address ettin repair 4 magpie kill 1 ettin outright, so each pass the result would be largely the same 6 to address ettin repair 4 magpie kill 1 ettin outright, so each pass the result would be largely the same
7 \n 7 \n
8 4 ettins have to be together to make cost and can only cover a specific area so the same amount of magpie can force a multiple of AA metal built if the front is large enough. If air player force 2-3x their metal share in their opponent to build AA and also score kills, then when ground lose to inferior force, it's not the air player fault. 8 4 ettins have to be together to make cost and can only cover a specific area so the same amount of magpie can force a multiple of AA metal built if the front is large enough. If air player force 2-3x their metal share in their opponent to build AA and also score kills, then when ground lose to inferior force, it's not the air player fault.
9 \n 9 \n
10 \n 10 \n
11 Magpie priority target to me and I expect other as well was almost alway AA, so AA first then the rest 11 Magpie priority target to me and I expect other as well was almost alway AA, so AA first then the rest
12 \n 12 \n
13 given move attack command, ettin do automatically retreat a bit, not as good as manual control of course but then you are forcing the oponent to lose more APM than you [air player can just shift queue the attack] 13 given move attack command, ettin do automatically retreat a bit, not as good as manual control of course but then you are forcing the oponent to lose more APM than you [air player can just shift queue the attack]
14 \n 14 \n
15 in comparision 15 in comparision
16 \n 16 \n
17 1 likho vs 4 ettin end with likho dead and 2 ettins down even if ettin is relatively clumbed up [almost to a point] [which they rarely are] and ettin is AoE AA so it should have been better against magpie than it is against Likho 17 1 likho vs 4 ettin end with likho dead and 2 ettins down even if ettin is relatively clumbed up [almost to a point] [which they rarely are] and ettin is AoE AA so it should have been better against magpie than it is against Likho
18 \n 18 \n
19 1 odin is killed by 3 ettin in 10-13 secs and ettins can respond better to odin due to their speed 19 1 odin is killed by 3 ettin in 10-13 secs and ettins can respond better to odin due to their speed
20 \n 20 \n
21 \n 21 \n
22 if your answer to magpie dominance is that the defender should have had more metal in shield and cloaker then I think it is high time to nerf magpie 22 if your answer to magpie dominance is that the defender should have had more metal in shield and cloaker then I think it is high time to nerf magpie
23 \n 23 \n
24 \n 24 \n
25 My problem is not that nothing can kill magpie, my argument is that it is too good for its cost. I am not addressing the E cost in this analysis and I admit this is a major weakness . 25 My problem is not that nothing can kill magpie, my argument is that it is too good for its cost. I am not addressing the E cost in this analysis and I admit this is a major weakness .
26 \n 26 \n
27 I am advocating for a minor nerf to HP making it closer to raven in term of hp per metal or a buff to AA AoE 27 I am advocating for a minor nerf to HP making it closer to raven in term of hp per metal or a buff to AA AoE
28 \n 28 \n
29 It would also be good for my morale if you publicly admit that 2 ettins were not "sufficient to shutdown all magpies" as I recall you said. 29 It would also be good for my morale if you publicly admit that 2 ettins were not "sufficient to shutdown all magpies" as I recall you said.
30 \n 30 \n
31 specifically you said: " he [the enemy] only needs two [ettins] to delete you [Sortale] from the game"
32 \n
31 \n 33 \n