1 |
How can we get multiple largish team matches going in parallel? This is a challenge for Zero-K that all parties can agree on.
|
1 |
How can we get multiple largish team matches going in parallel? This is a challenge for Zero-K that all parties can agree on.
|
2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
3 |
What makes TAW special compared to matchmaking?
|
3 |
What makes TAW special compared to matchmaking?
|
4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
5 |
1. You see who the other players are
|
5 |
1. You see who the other players are
|
6 |
2. You see which map is going to be played on
|
6 |
2. You see which map is going to be played on
|
7 |
3. The matches are large
|
7 |
3. The matches are large
|
8 |
4. The skill level is mixed
|
8 |
4. The skill level is mixed
|
9 |
5. It is a social lobby for everybody, the right place to be if you want to play.
|
9 |
5. It is a social lobby for everybody, the right place to be if you want to play.
|
10 |
\n
|
10 |
\n
|
11 |
Can we find and agree on a compromise to help Zero-K grow?
|
11 |
Can we find and agree on a compromise to help Zero-K grow?
|
12 |
\n
|
12 |
\n
|
13 |
So let me make a wild and rough proposal.
|
13 |
So let me make a wild and rough proposal.
|
14 |
\n
|
14 |
\n
|
15 |
* Zero-k gets a mechanism mixing matchmaking and TAW.
|
15 |
* Zero-k gets a mechanism mixing matchmaking and TAW.
|
16 |
Try to appease as many as possible while allowing for more players.
|
16 |
Try to appease as many as possible while allowing for more players.
|
17 |
\n
|
17 |
\n
|
18 |
* The team sizes are large.
|
18 |
* The team sizes are large.
|
19 |
Minimum like 10v10 or something.
|
19 |
Minimum like 10v10 or something.
|
20 |
Dynamically adjust size with active player count at the time.
|
20 |
Dynamically adjust size with active player count at the time.
|
21 |
Prefer multiple matches over fewer large matches.
|
21 |
Prefer multiple matches over fewer large matches.
|
22 |
\n
|
22 |
\n
|
23 |
* Skills could be mixed, but fair teams.
|
23 |
* Skills could be mixed, but fair teams.
|
24 |
Balance not just numerically, but also by even numbers of try-hards and slackers.
|
24 |
Balance not just numerically, but also by even numbers of try-hards and slackers.
|
25 |
\n
|
25 |
\n
|
26 |
* Once a match is found, people get to see who they are playing with and on what map.
|
26 |
* Once a match is found, people get to see who they are playing with and on what map.
|
27 |
Players can refuse, others fill in, until map/player pool is deemed a failure.
|
27 |
Players can refuse, others fill in, until map/player pool is deemed a failure.
|
28 |
Water map? Just refuse. That dork is there? Just refuse.
|
28 |
Water map? Just refuse. That dork is there? Just refuse.
|
29 |
\n
|
29 |
\n
|
30 |
* People join through an option in the matchmaker or by going to a special lobby.
|
30 |
* People join through an option in the matchmaker or by going to a special lobby.
|
31 |
We need to make it easy.
|
31 |
We need to make it easy.
|
32 |
A big lobby that spawns matches sounds fun.
|
32 |
A big lobby that spawns matches sounds fun.
|
33 |
\n
|
33 |
\n
|
34 |
* All matches can be spectated freely.
|
34 |
* All matches can be spectated freely.
|
35 |
Spec-K is fun.
|
35 |
Spec-K is fun.
|
36 |
\n
|
36 |
\n
|
|
|
37 |
If this was tried and didn't work or is an unsalvageably bad idea, please let me know. I'm just trying to find a way forward.
|
|
|
38 |
\n
|
37 |
I'm willing to provide support, be active during tests, explain stuff, hype up people, write up experiences.
|
39 |
I'm willing to provide support, be active during tests, explain stuff, hype up people, write up experiences.
|
38 |
\n
|
40 |
\n
|
39 |
I think this needs UI work.
|
41 |
I think this needs UI work.
|