Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

32-player TAW is not good for Zero-K

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
7/12/2025 8:55:41 AMUSrankQuietMute before revert after revert
7/12/2025 8:55:07 AMUSrankQuietMute before revert after revert
7/12/2025 8:54:44 AMUSrankQuietMute before revert after revert
Before After
1 I'll stop playing for now. I want 10 v. 10 minimum - for small maps - but I highly prefer 12v12 or more. Max 11v11 means 10v10 is likely and it is not worth checking to see if a game is available instead of playing something besides zk. The games I play, like zk, tax my system too much to have 2 running at once. 1 I'll stop playing for now. I want 10 v. 10 minimum - for small maps - but I highly prefer 12v12 or more. Max 11v11 means 10v10 is likely and it is not worth checking to see if a game is available instead of playing something besides zk. The games I play, like zk, tax my system too much to have 2 running at once.
2 \n 2 \n
3 This thread and the large number of likes for more options somehow was taken as a vote for making the max number of players lower - which is not what the majority of people wanted in this thread. It is crazy that devs implicit bias is so strong that they misinterpret what people wanted and did EXACTLY what players did not want. 3