| 1 |
Hm... I wonder if TAW could be made into more of a matchmaking things instead of just a custom autohost lobby
|
1 |
Hm... I wonder if TAW could be made into more of a matchmaking things instead of just a custom autohost lobby
|
| 2 |
I think the large pot should probably still persist as 32 player room, the difficulty lies in trying to seed another room from there.
|
2 |
I think the large pot should probably still persist as 32 player room, the difficulty lies in trying to seed another room from there.
|
| 3 |
\n
|
3 |
\n
|
| 4 |
Maybe matchmaking/a second lobby could be offered once a game finishes and a room is full or at a certain size?
|
4 |
Maybe matchmaking/a second lobby could be offered once a game finishes and a room is full or at a certain size?
|
| 5 |
Splitting is painfull, so it may be better to allow people to opt in to play a smaller second lobby.
|
5 |
Splitting is painfull, so it may be better to allow people to opt in to play a smaller second lobby.
|
| 6 |
\n
|
6 |
\n
|
| 7 |
That way those who enjoy a large pot can ignore it and stay while those who are fine with playing smaller teams can play a smaller TAW, that can be used to seed a second pot.
|
7 |
That way those who enjoy a large pot can ignore it and stay while those who are fine with playing smaller teams can play a smaller TAW, that can be used to seed a second pot.
|
| 8 |
\n
|
8 |
\n
|
| 9 |
Maybe
it
could
be
innitally
limited
to
a
size
of
2v2
-
4v4
to
not
kill
the
main
room,
and
also
to
prevent
backing
out
of
the
lobby
the
game
could
start
immediatly
if
the
players
who
opt
in
can
be
put
into
a
resonably
balanced
match.
|
9 |
Maybe
it
could
be
innitally
limited
to
a
size
of
2v2
-
4v4
to
not
kill
the
main
room,
and
also,
to
prevent
backing
out
of
the
lobby,
the
game
could
start
immediatly
if
the
players
who
opt
in
can
be
put
into
a
resonably
balanced
match.
|
| 10 |
\n
|
10 |
\n
|
32-player TAW is not good for Zero-K