| 1 |
From @SnuggleBass
|
1 |
From @SnuggleBass
|
| 2 |
> Personally I'm of the opinion that MM should be the main interface for the majority of players.
|
2 |
> Personally I'm of the opinion that MM should be the main interface for the majority of players.
|
| 3 |
\n
|
3 |
\n
|
| 4 |
Yes, 100% yes. The best situation would be competitive play as 1v1, teams, FFA, lobpot would all go through a matchmaker.
|
4 |
Yes, 100% yes. The best situation would be competitive play as 1v1, teams, FFA, lobpot would all go through a matchmaker.
|
| 5 |
\n
|
5 |
\n
|
| 6 |
Except 1v1 they don't currently, and that is telling a lot. 1v1 is happening through the matchmaker because people understand that it is the right way to find matches. And it is successfully happening because just 2 people need to agree.
|
6 |
Except 1v1 they don't currently, and that is telling a lot. 1v1 is happening through the matchmaker because people understand that it is the right way to find matches. And it is successfully happening because just 2 people need to agree.
|
| 7 |
\n
|
7 |
\n
|
| 8 |
The other options don't happen through the matchmaker. The inertia to compete against the big public famous TAW lobby is too large. Except one time, through extreme hype, we actually managed to get a couple of small team games with the matchmaker. It was like a miracle.
|
8 |
The other options don't happen through the matchmaker. The inertia to compete against the big public famous TAW lobby is too large. Except one time, through extreme hype, we actually managed to get a couple of small team games with the matchmaker. It was like a miracle.
|
| 9 |
\n
|
9 |
\n
|
| 10 |
I
think
that
the
UI
needs
to
change
to
make
a
matchmaker
for
the
other
game
modes
the
defacto
interface.
The
best
we
can
here,
I
guess,
is
figure
out
what
is
best.
|
10 |
I
think
that
the
UI
needs
to
change
to
make
a
matchmaker
for
the
other
game
modes
the
defacto
interface,
because
the
existing
matchmaker
is
not
used
for
years.
|
32-player TAW is not good for Zero-K