| 1 |
yeah
i
agree
chess
does
prevent
new
players
playing
with
pro's
and
it
works
well
since
the
game
is
1v1
its
much
easier
to
divide
100
players
into
500
games
of
closley
matched
skill.
|
1 |
yeah
i
agree
chess
does
prevent
new
players
playing
with
pro's
and
it
works
well
since
the
game
is
1v1
its
much
easier
to
divide
1000
players
into
500
games
of
closley
matched
skill.
|
| 2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
| 3 |
pro's would get bored beating noobs and noobs would be driven away by pro's
|
3 |
pro's would get bored beating noobs and noobs would be driven away by pro's
|
| 4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
| 5 |
you make a good point but in small rooms the pros will still hunt lobsters for elo.. and the noobs will have whole lanes to defend on there own sometimes hoplessly
|
5 |
you make a good point but in small rooms the pros will still hunt lobsters for elo.. and the noobs will have whole lanes to defend on there own sometimes hoplessly
|
| 6 |
\n
|
6 |
\n
|
| 7 |
both our points seem valid here.. there will be tears when a noob is alone vs a pro. atleast in huge games the chances of both sides having a pro and a noob was better. but also likewise if games could eventualy be sorted by rank then new players could learn with other players of simmilar skills
|
7 |
both our points seem valid here.. there will be tears when a noob is alone vs a pro. atleast in huge games the chances of both sides having a pro and a noob was better. but also likewise if games could eventualy be sorted by rank then new players could learn with other players of simmilar skills
|
Goodbye my beloved Zero-K #32playerTAWisBetter