| 1 |
From @Hellaciouss:
|
1 |
From @Hellaciouss:
|
| 2 |
[quote] For me, I am not great at micro, I prefer a more supporting role which is not feasible in small matches as in small matches you have to perform all roles at all times - not my cup of tea, never has been. Those games are for young kids who have something to prove. [/quote]
|
2 |
[quote] For me, I am not great at micro, I prefer a more supporting role which is not feasible in small matches as in small matches you have to perform all roles at all times - not my cup of tea, never has been. Those games are for young kids who have something to prove. [/quote]
|
| 3 |
\n
|
3 |
\n
|
| 4 |
This isn't at all about micro, support vs offensive roles or showing off.
|
4 |
This isn't at all about micro, support vs offensive roles or showing off.
|
| 5 |
\n
|
5 |
\n
|
| 6 |
In many lobpot matches I spent a lot of my attention and metal in ecoing, griding and remexing. Isn't this support? There are many useful things that can be done that don't require excellent micro.
|
6 |
In many lobpot matches I spent a lot of my attention and metal in ecoing, griding and remexing. Isn't this support? There are many useful things that can be done that don't require excellent micro.
|
| 7 |
\n
|
7 |
\n
|
| 8 |
This isn't about elitism either. I'd gladly explain how things works, why some things are better, or how to configure Zero-K, if I can help.
|
8 |
This isn't about elitism either. I'd gladly explain how things works, why some things are better, or how to configure Zero-K, if I can help.
|
| 9 |
\n
|
9 |
\n
|
| 10 |
This
is
about
some
players
not
wanting
to
figure
out
what
the
team
needs
to
win
and
then
do
that.
People
not
wanting
or
not
listening
to
advice
but
rather
just
doing
their
play
in
a
big
match
where
they
don't
immediately
lose.
I
get
it,
it's
fun
to
be
able
to
try
things
and
let
others
struggle
with
the
necessary
grunt
work.
The
big
lobpot
basically
forces
everybody
to
cooperate.
But
come
on,
you
can't
be
serious
to
demand
that
that
is
all
there
is
to
Zero-K,
day
in
day
out,
for
years.
There
are
people
that
want
their
team
to
win
and
do
what's
necessary,
and
for
them
the
lobpot
can
be
frustrating
work.
That's
unfair!
|
10 |
This
is
about
some
players
not
wanting
to
figure
out
what
the
team
needs
to
win
and
then
do
that.
People
not
wanting
or
not
listening
to
advice
but
rather
just
doing
their
play
in
a
big
match
where
they
don't
immediately
lose.
I
get
it,
it's
fun
to
be
able
to
try
things
and
let
others
struggle
with
the
necessary
grunt
work.
The
big
lobpot
basically
forces
everybody
to
cooperate.
There
are
people
that
want
their
team
to
win
and
do
what's
necessary,
and
for
them
the
lobpot
can
be
frustrating
work.
That's
unfair!
Come
on,
you
can't
be
serious
to
demand
that
that
is
all
there
is
to
Zero-K,
day
in
day
out,
for
years.
|
| 11 |
\n
|
11 |
\n
|
| 12 |
Every sport out there has leagues and tournaments. This provides a reasonable experience to everybody involved. How is it bad then for Zero-K to have multiple lobbies with different meta/skill?
|
12 |
Every sport out there has leagues and tournaments. This provides a reasonable experience to everybody involved. How is it bad then for Zero-K to have multiple lobbies with different meta/skill?
|
| 13 |
\n
|
13 |
\n
|
32-player TAW is not good for Zero-K