| 1 |
[quote]Important part of BAR vs ZK economy is that noobs don't leech your mex income in BAR, so that guy in the back idling on his 3 mex playing simcity at 0 damage will not steal my front expansion income.[/quote]
|
1 |
[quote]Important part of BAR vs ZK economy is that noobs don't leech your mex income in BAR, so that guy in the back idling on his 3 mex playing simcity at 0 damage will not steal my front expansion income.[/quote]
|
| 2 |
Good point about shared mex. Still, if you're getting smashed at front in ZK at least the simcity player might actually be upping your income with their overdrive. On certain maps in BAR, you rarely can capture new mexes, you just get to facetank while backline greeds, and you never get a single extra unit of metal until Mr Simcity stomps past your dead base with their too-late T3 :D Even if your team wins, the meatshield role really sucks.
|
2 |
Good point about shared mex. Still, if you're getting smashed at front in ZK at least the simcity player might actually be upping your income with their overdrive. On certain maps in BAR, you rarely can capture new mexes, you just get to facetank while backline greeds, and you never get a single extra unit of metal until Mr Simcity stomps past your dead base with their too-late T3 :D Even if your team wins, the meatshield role really sucks.
|
| 3 |
\n
|
3 |
\n
|
| 4 |
[quote]Hey, the guy with 59OS is here (well, the max I ever got in team games was 59OS, which was equivalent to top 12).[/quote]
|
4 |
[quote]Hey, the guy with 59OS is here (well, the max I ever got in team games was 59OS, which was equivalent to top 12).[/quote]
|
| 5 |
Your
thoughts
seem
pretty
much
accurate,
although
I'd
say
a
bit
selective
of
BARs
weaker
points
and
more
pro-player
relevent.
Messing
around
with
20-something
OS
players
a
lot
of
it
doesn't
matter
so
much.
BAR
seems
much
less
fun
as
a
pro
player
imo.
The
strict
build
order
and
the
toxicity
if
you
do
anything
odd
is
a
downside
any
PvP
room,
but
pros
are
especially
creative
when
get
nasty,
and
they
get
nasty
really
often.
Present
company
excluded,
izirayd
=
good
guy
afaik.
:)
|
5 |
Your
thoughts
seem
pretty
much
accurate,
although
I'd
say
a
bit
selective
of
BARs
weaker
points
and
more
pro-player
relevent.
Messing
around
with
20-something
OS
players
a
lot
of
it
doesn't
matter
so
much.
BAR
seems
much
less
fun
as
a
pro
player
imo.
The
strict
build
order
and
the
toxicity
if
you
do
anything
odd
is
a
downside
in
any
PvP
room,
but
pros
seem
to
be
especially
creative
when
get
nasty,
and
they
get
nasty
really
often.
Present
company
excluded,
izirayd
=
good
guy
afaik.
:)
|
| 6 |
\n
|
6 |
\n
|
| 7 |
In Zero-K TAW, when I play against you I feel the skill levels are such that I can still make my team very competitive against yours even if we don't have a purple, or if I have to fight against you in a lane. In BAR, where I'm mid to high 20s OS (above average but meh), the difference is massive. Even someone in 30+OS range feels pretty untouchable in a straight fight. Kudos for the 50+, that's insane skill!
|
7 |
In Zero-K TAW, when I play against you I feel the skill levels are such that I can still make my team very competitive against yours even if we don't have a purple, or if I have to fight against you in a lane. In BAR, where I'm mid to high 20s OS (above average but meh), the difference is massive. Even someone in 30+OS range feels pretty untouchable in a straight fight. Kudos for the 50+, that's insane skill!
|
| 8 |
\n
|
8 |
\n
|
| 9 |
You could totally turn your thoughts here into a pretty good BAR vs ZK video, actually! You should team up with one of the ZK video guys and make it!
|
9 |
You could totally turn your thoughts here into a pretty good BAR vs ZK video, actually! You should team up with one of the ZK video guys and make it!
|
BAR and Zero-K Comparison