Post edit history
32-player TAW is not good for Zero-K
| Before | After | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | From @Medlazer | 1 | From @Medlazer |
| 2 | [quote] The stats shared 1-2 weeks past the change were fuelled by conscious attempts to seed new lobbies in support of the change. That skewed results. [/quote] | 2 | [quote] The stats shared 1-2 weeks past the change were fuelled by conscious attempts to seed new lobbies in support of the change. That skewed results. [/quote] |
| 3 | \n | 3 | \n |
| 4 | The stats are also skewed by people intentionally not playing since the change to try coerce the reversal of the changes. | 4 | The stats are also skewed by people intentionally not playing since the change to try coerce the reversal of the changes. |
| 5 | \n | 5 | \n |
| 6 | Sure, if good data is available, go with the data, but consider that sometimes your data is incomplete, biased, correlated, poisenend, etc. and you have to go with experiments/speculation/your gut. Or don't. | 6 | Sure, if good data is available, go with the data, but consider that sometimes your data is incomplete, biased, correlated, poisenend, etc. and you have to go with further experiments/speculation/your gut. Or don't. |