Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

32-player TAW is not good for Zero-K

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
8/30/2025 11:54:19 PMPTrankraaar before revert after revert
Before After
1 A thing that might improve the experience for both groups new/casual and the more competitive ones is a kind of culture shift where they play in different rooms. 1 A thing that might improve the experience for both new/casual and the more competitive players is a kind of culture shift where they play in different rooms.
2 \n 2 \n
3 With the current setup, high ranks could join palladium, low ranks could join niobium. 3 With the current setup, high ranks could join palladium, low ranks could join niobium.
4 \n 4 \n
5 I've seen and participated in populated palladium evenings. 5 I've seen and participated in populated palladium evenings.
6 \n 6 \n
7 Niobium may not see much play because the people that'd join it probably just prefer going to the most populated room they can join. 7 Niobium may not see much play because the people that'd join it probably just prefer going to the most populated room they can join.
8 \n 8 \n
9 I generally avoid the TAW room when it has a high % below yellow rank. Blue or even yellow is ok (maybe palladium's min rank is too high atm). 9 I generally avoid the TAW room when it has a high % below yellow rank. Blue or even yellow is ok (maybe palladium's min rank is too high atm).