| 1 |
[quote]no place in the back was safe, whats the point of building singu just to loose it again and again, like the previous singu we made ?[/quote]
|
1 |
[quote]no place in the back was safe, whats the point of building singu just to loose it again and again, like the previous singu we made ?[/quote]
|
| 2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
| 3 |
I just answered that, if it isnt economical for your enemy to take out your Singu then its worth building it. If they have to spend say 4 odins (6k metal) to take out your 1 Singu (4k metal) and you get all the reclaim, then its not worth doing.
|
3 |
I just answered that, if it isnt economical for your enemy to take out your Singu then its worth building it. If they have to spend say 4 odins (6k metal) to take out your 1 Singu (4k metal) and you get all the reclaim, then its not worth doing.
|
| 4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
| 5 |
Funnel spam cant hold up against the amount of artillery they made. Also a silo can just emp the funnels. The Singu is a single point of failure for the whole front, that is what makes it so risky. You just have to kill that one thing that has only 4k hp.
|
5 |
Funnel spam cant hold up against the amount of artillery they made. Also a silo can just emp the funnels. The Singu is a single point of failure for the whole front, that is what makes it so risky. You just have to kill that one thing that has only 4k hp.
|
|
|
6 |
\n
|
|
|
7 |
[quote]Still the rules are for everyone, my move was desperate but legit, what he did isnt.[/quote]
|
|
|
8 |
I would say the opposite, he was desperate because you didn't listen so he did something that is normally not legit.
|
B2252604 21 on LimeQuat Republic v1.24 (Multiplayer)