1 |
There are probably multiple problems with the balancing algorithm, for example http://zero-k.info/Forum/Thread/36555 , to quote "The results indicate that the larger team does have a moderate advantage depending on team sizes and the exact model"
|
1 |
There are probably multiple problems with the balancing algorithm, for example http://zero-k.info/Forum/Thread/36555 , to quote "The results indicate that the larger team does have a moderate advantage depending on team sizes and the exact model"
|
2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
3 |
That's on top of any potential issue of rank distribution, because I think in this case the problem was that the distribution of the two teams was so "different" (basically "best ranked + lowest ranked" versus "middle ranked")
|
3 |
That's on top of any potential issue of rank distribution, because I think in this case the problem was that the distribution of the two teams was so "different" (basically "best ranked + lowest ranked" versus "middle ranked")
|
4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
5 |
Now,
I
don't
think
that
changing
it
without
a
through
analysis
is
smart
either.
I
have
seen
games
that
I
thought
they
were
worse
balance
than
this
one
and
the
result
was
opposite
than
what
I
thought.
.
.
|
5 |
Now,
I
don't
think
that
changing
it
without
a
through
analysis
is
smart
either.
I
have
seen
games
that
I
thought
they
were
worse
balanced
than
this
one
and
the
result
was
opposite
than
what
I
thought
initially.
.
.
|