1 |
ELO is used to try to make a "good" balance (approximate). So a game that is "not well taken into account" would make that worse.
|
1 |
ELO is used to try to make a "good" balance (approximate). So a game that is "not well taken into account" would make that worse.
|
2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
3 |
Now, I think ideally ELO should just eliminate players that resigned in the first 2-3 minutes. Because the real issue is that for this game the balancer really "imagines" that mojjj played, when he didn't.
|
3 |
Now, I think ideally ELO should just eliminate players that resigned in the first 2-3 minutes. Because the real issue is that for this game the balancer really "imagines" that mojjj played, when he didn't.
|
4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
5 |
So, ok, winning team could get some credit, but not that it played again a "very good team".
|
5 |
So, ok, winning team could get some credit, but not that it played again a "very good team".
|
6 |
\n
|
6 |
\n
|
7 |
If both fixes to the balancer would happen (small bonus for smaller team, and taking into account people that just left very early), nothing would be needed afterward.
|
7 |
If both fixes to the balancer would happen (small bonus for smaller team, and taking into account people that just left very early), nothing would be needed afterward.
|
|
|
8 |
\n
|
|
|
9 |
Edit: even worse if mojjj team would have won, the players would get much less credit for the win than deserved, because balancer think mojjj was the one winning it.
|