Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

Anyone any idea how to improve the situation?

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
5/14/2026 10:34:57 PMDErankkatastrophe before revert after revert
5/14/2026 10:01:28 PMDErankkatastrophe before revert after revert
5/14/2026 10:00:49 PMDErankkatastrophe before revert after revert
Before After
1 So, I'll just give you these replays: 1 So, I'll just give you these replays:
2 \n 2 \n
3 https://zero-k.info/Battles/Detail/2425264 3 https://zero-k.info/Battles/Detail/2425264
4 https://zero-k.info/Battles/Detail/2425279 4 https://zero-k.info/Battles/Detail/2425279
5 https://zero-k.info/Battles/Detail/2425282 5 https://zero-k.info/Battles/Detail/2425282
6 https://zero-k.info/Battles/Detail/2425292 6 https://zero-k.info/Battles/Detail/2425292
7 https://zero-k.info/Battles/Detail/2425302 7 https://zero-k.info/Battles/Detail/2425302
8 https://zero-k.info/Battles/Detail/2425304 8 https://zero-k.info/Battles/Detail/2425304
9 \n 9 \n
10 This has been most of my zk evening so far. More or less same team, and overall same outcome: 1 team gets stomped because multiple players sit at the back. Six times in a row. 10 This has been most of my zk evening so far. More or less same team, and overall same outcome: 1 team gets stomped because multiple players sit at the back. Six times in a row.
11 Now, I don't think this backsitting is or should be reportable. But, no matter how you put it, this is not a good situation. I am pretty sure I am not the only one who finds this extremely frustrating and unfair. And it's not about losing itself, but being barely able to play the game because you more or less get stomped in the first 10 min. It's also very hard to justify putting efford into any of the later games because, hey, why even bother if it doesn't matter in the end? 11 Now, I don't think this backsitting is or should be reportable. But, no matter how you put it, this is not a good situation. I am pretty sure I am not the only one who finds this extremely frustrating and unfair. And it's not about losing itself, but being barely able to play the game because you more or less get stomped in the first 10 min. It's also very hard to justify putting efford into any of the later games because, hey, why even bother if it doesn't matter in the end?
12 \n 12 \n
13 Now, yes, sure you can say the viable alternative is too not play the game. But I do not think not engaging with the problem will solve anything. So, any ideas about what could be done? 13 Now, yes, sure you can say the viable alternative is too not play the game. But I do not think not engaging with the problem will solve anything. So, any ideas about what could be done?
14 \n 14 \n
15 Is mixing teams up after one or 2 games at the cost of balance worth it? Probably not. But if anyone has any idea, please let us hear it. 15 Is mixing teams up after one or 2 games at the cost of balance worth it? Probably not. But if anyone has any idea, please let us hear it.
16 \n 16 \n
17 Also, at this current rate I am losing between 60 and 90 WHR PER DAY. But I doubt this is good for balance overall, because I can hardly be the only one affected. 17 Also, at this current rate I am losing between 60 and 90 WHR PER DAY. I doubt this is good for balance overall, because I can hardly be the only one affected.
18 \n 18 \n
19 \n 19 \n