1 |
You're right topf, we don't have the playerbase to maintain this.
|
1 |
You're right topf, we don't have the playerbase to maintain this.
|
2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
3 |
But I don't like playing the really large games, and playing smaller games with low elo allies is like playing 1v1 with speedbumps. So I find most of the time... I just don't play.
|
3 |
But I don't like playing the really large games, and playing smaller games with low elo allies is like playing 1v1 with speedbumps. So I find most of the time... I just don't play.
|
4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
5 |
I
don't
know
if
this
is
the
answer
though.
I
think
private
small
game
hosts
is
a
better
idea
as
they
have
fewer
players
and
no
hard
elo
requirements
(
just
allowing
the
players
to
balance
themselves,
speccing
only
when
necessary)
.
We
have
to
boost
our
playerbase
if
we
want
to
do
anything
else,
and
then
room
splitting
will
take
care
of
it
organically
(
If
only
4v4's
were
more
stable)
.
|
5 |
I
don't
know
if
this
is
the
answer
though.
I
think
private
small
game
hosts
is
a
better
idea
as
they
have
fewer
players
and
no
hard
elo
requirements
(
just
allowing
the
players
to
balance
themselves,
speccing
only
when
necessary)
.
We
have
to
boost
our
playerbase
if
we
want
to
do
anything
else,
and
then
room
splitting
will
take
care
of
it
organically-
If
only
4v4
and
lower
were
more
stable
(
though
90%
of
the
high
elo
games
we
just
played
tonight
were
below
4v4)
.
|