| 1 |
There appears to be some confusion here, with the exception of the faraday-venom pair(note that neither does actual damage) I never meant to say that mobiles should morph to statics NEVER, YOU HEAR ?
|
1 |
There appears to be some confusion here, with the exception of the faraday-venom pair(note that neither does actual damage) I never meant to say that mobiles should morph to statics NEVER, YOU HEAR ?
|
| 2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
| 3 |
I was talking in terms of sacrificing statics in as a way to strengthen an offensive either to finish off an entrenched (but weakened) enemy faster or as a last resort when the other team has a significant eco advantage and is just waiting for a superweapon to score an easy win
|
3 |
I was talking in terms of sacrificing statics in as a way to strengthen an offensive either to finish off an entrenched (but weakened) enemy faster or as a last resort when the other team has a significant eco advantage and is just waiting for a superweapon to score an easy win
|
| 4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
| 5 |
also:
|
5 |
also:
|
| 6 |
|
6 |
|
| 7 |
quote:
|
7 |
quote:
|
| 8 |
Additionaly Ideas: Stinger -> Grizzly
|
8 |
Additionaly Ideas: Stinger -> Grizzly
|
| 9 |
|
9 |
|
| 10 |
no,
perhaps
Annihilator->
Grizzly
|
10 |
NO
not
even
close,
perhaps
Annihilator->
Grizzly
|
| 11 |
\n
|
11 |
\n
|
| 12 |
\n
|
12 |
\n
|
| 13 |
quote:
|
13 |
quote:
|
| 14 |
Lotus -> Mace (There is not a "MLT")
|
14 |
Lotus -> Mace (There is not a "MLT")
|
| 15 |
\n
|
15 |
\n
|
| 16 |
NO
|
16 |
NO
|
| 17 |
\n
|
17 |
\n
|
| 18 |
Lotus-> Bandit or flea (if at all, since by the stage where you would need to morph defences to fuel an offensive light unit swarms are no longer effective)
|
18 |
Lotus-> Bandit or flea (if at all, since by the stage where you would need to morph defences to fuel an offensive light unit swarms are no longer effective)
|
| 19 |
\n
|
19 |
\n
|
| 20 |
Edit:
|
20 |
Edit:
|
| 21 |
\n
|
21 |
\n
|
| 22 |
Eisai:
|
22 |
Eisai:
|
| 23 |
This would encourage porcing mexes on map...And then you would with your +++metal just morph your porc into whatever you need,it's too flexible, and it would ruin zero-k if u ask me...
|
23 |
This would encourage porcing mexes on map...And then you would with your +++metal just morph your porc into whatever you need,it's too flexible, and it would ruin zero-k if u ask me...
|
| 24 |
\n
|
24 |
\n
|
| 25 |
First
of
all
I
clearly
stated
using
this
option
would
cause
the
player
to
loose
an
amount
of
metal
for
each
morph
due
to
the
cost
of
the
building+morph
being
at
least
15%
higher
than
just
building
the
unit
in
a
factory
so
while
the
morph
may
be
cheaper
than
the
unit,
overall
it
costs
more
add
the
fact
that
they
cannot
defend
themselves
while
being
built
or
morphing
and
|
25 |
First
of
all
I
clearly
stated
using
this
option
would
cause
the
player
to
loose
an
amount
of
metal
for
each
morph
due
to
the
cost
of
the
building+morph
being
at
least
15%
higher
than
just
building
the
unit
in
a
factory
so
while
the
morph
may
be
cheaper
than
the
unit,
overall
it
costs
more
add
the
fact
that
they
cannot
defend
themselves
while
being
built
or
morphing
|
| 26 |
so where is the “+++metal”???
|
26 |
so where is the “+++metal”???
|
| 27 |
\n
|
27 |
\n
|
| 28 |
Furthermore how would you “just morph your porc into whatever you need” if you only have 1 or 2 (at most) options per building (with the second (if present) requiring a certain minimum xp level (xp of the building not of the player))
|
28 |
Furthermore how would you “just morph your porc into whatever you need” if you only have 1 or 2 (at most) options per building (with the second (if present) requiring a certain minimum xp level (xp of the building not of the player))
|
| 29 |
\n
|
29 |
\n
|
When the walls come charging in…