| 1 |
I share abma's frustration.
|
1 |
I share abma's frustration.
|
| 2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
| 3 |
[quote]Also there is no management that would force devs to simply fix most annoying bugs. Devs tend to work on new stuff rather than fixing exisitng. [/quote]
|
3 |
[quote]Also there is no management that would force devs to simply fix most annoying bugs. Devs tend to work on new stuff rather than fixing exisitng. [/quote]
|
| 4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
| 5 |
It can be done. And it should be done.
|
5 |
It can be done. And it should be done.
|
| 6 |
"Want to add that new extra feature that you'll feel great while coding it? Fine, then fix that other bug assigned to you before your shiny new feature gets accepted into main branch".
|
6 |
"Want to add that new extra feature that you'll feel great while coding it? Fine, then fix that other bug assigned to you before your shiny new feature gets accepted into main branch".
|
| 7 |
\n
|
7 |
\n
|
| 8 |
I know, I already rambled uselessly many times about the lack of branches and the recurring revert-craze caused by lack of communication/management. I know it won't change, I just wanted to point out that another model is possible.
|
8 |
I know, I already rambled uselessly many times about the lack of branches and the recurring revert-craze caused by lack of communication/management. I know it won't change, I just wanted to point out that another model is possible.
|
|
|
9 |
\n
|
|
|
10 |
[quote]Also, I don't think the bug tracker needs to include issues like this one: http://code.google.com/p/zero-k/issues/detail?id=1774 [/quote]
|
|
|
11 |
\n
|
|
|
12 |
If the message is, this issue should be closed rather than left as it is, I agree. if the message is, people should not be allowed to post new issues because most are dumb, I disagree (on the permission to post, not necessarily on the latter part).
|
@devs: bug tracker