Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

should allied construction be reclaimable

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
8/20/2013 8:35:01 AMDErankAdminmojjj before revert after revert
8/20/2013 8:34:46 AMDErankAdminmojjj before revert after revert
Before After
1 [quote]What do you mean "Is Ok"? Is it possible within the game mechanics? [/qoute] 1 [quote]What do you mean "Is Ok"? Is it possible within the game mechanics? [/quote]
2 \n 2 \n
3 yes. example: on ravager , when trolls come from surrounding sea and plop def turrets with their imba buildrange on supportcoms/shits on the cliff, the upper coms try to reclaim it faster than it is built (maybe this is the only way in this situation here) 3 yes. example: on ravager , when trolls come from surrounding sea and plop def turrets with their imba buildrange on supportcoms/shits on the cliff, the upper coms try to reclaim it faster than it is built (maybe this is the only way in this situation here)
4 \n 4 \n
5 [quote]Abandoned nanoframes or frames being reclaimed should be able to be reclaimed freely by allies, but if it's actively being built, it allows way more trolliness than it does any actualy legitimate use.[/quote] 5 [quote]Abandoned nanoframes or frames being reclaimed should be able to be reclaimed freely by allies, but if it's actively being built, it allows way more trolliness than it does any actualy legitimate use.[/quote]
6 \n 6 \n
7 or nanoframes decay hitpoints over time if not being buit/repaired. 7 or nanoframes decay hitpoints over time if not being buit/repaired.