| 1 |
[quote]I said this a while ago and not only because general is at least half balance discussion. I don't think an elo requirement is strictly necessary.[/quote]
|
1 |
[quote]I said this a while ago and not only because general is at least half balance discussion. I don't think an elo requirement is strictly necessary.[/quote]
|
| 2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
| 3 |
I
think
the
elo
restriction
is
a
good
idea.
every
singule
post
that
is
tangenting
or
innaccurate
risks
derailing
the
thread.
|
3 |
I
think
the
elo
restriction
is
a
good
idea.
Every
singular
post
that
is
tangenting
or
neon
or
innaccurate
or
just
plain
stupid
risks
being
the
subject
of
someones
reply
and
derailing
the
thread.
|
| 4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
| 5 |
[quote]The current balance discussions are pretty good if you ignore the chaff.[/quote]
|
5 |
[quote]The current balance discussions are pretty good if you ignore the chaff.[/quote]
|
| 6 |
\n
|
6 |
\n
|
| 7 |
I
dont
see
why
we
should
have
to
ignore
the
chaff.
Better
to
just
prevent
the
chaff
from
posting
and/or
moderate/delete
their
posts.
|
7 |
I
dont
see
why
we
should
have
to
ignore
the
chaff.
Better
to
just
prevent
the
chaff
from
posting
and/or
moderate/delete
their
posts
until
they
learn
to
contribute
instead
of
derail.
|
| 8 |
\n
|
8 |
\n
|
| 9 |
[quote]Also hiding posts with too many negative votes doesn't work if you simply want to disagree by -1ing.[/quote]
|
9 |
[quote]Also hiding posts with too many negative votes doesn't work if you simply want to disagree by -1ing.[/quote]
|
| 10 |
\n
|
10 |
\n
|
| 11 |
I would make it a net negative -3 to make invisible, so a single +1 on the post would make it visible again until it reached -4. The purpose of invisible is to remove posts from the canon argument above so people dont reply to them without realising that the content should be ignored.
|
11 |
I would make it a net negative -3 to make invisible, so a single +1 on the post would make it visible again until it reached -4. The purpose of invisible is to remove posts from the canon argument above so people dont reply to them without realising that the content should be ignored.
|
| 12 |
\n
|
12 |
\n
|
| 13 |
[quote]Most of the trolls and neonstormers are high elo.[/quote]
|
13 |
[quote]Most of the trolls and neonstormers are high elo.[/quote]
|
| 14 |
\n
|
14 |
\n
|
| 15 |
I would hope forum mods could do us a solid and delete any walls of neon from the usual suspects, but short of that for repeat offenders it would be nice to have a way of temp banning them from posting in the balance subforum.
|
15 |
I would hope forum mods could do us a solid and delete any walls of neon from the usual suspects, but short of that for repeat offenders it would be nice to have a way of temp banning them from posting in the balance subforum.
|
| 16 |
\n
|
16 |
\n
|
| 17 |
[quote]Could you write a stickied post and some format to how the opening posts should look like, what should be addressed? [/quote]
|
17 |
[quote]Could you write a stickied post and some format to how the opening posts should look like, what should be addressed? [/quote]
|
| 18 |
\n
|
18 |
\n
|
| 19 |
Absolutely.
|
19 |
Absolutely.
|
Balance Subforum Request