| 1 |
[quote]And that usually comes from a matter of ideology - GBrank[GBC]1v0ry_k1ng prefers minimalist stat++/stat-- changes. Discussing larger issues that may contribute to Unit X's problems causes threadjacks because the thread is now about the larger issue, so I see the frustration.
|
1 |
[quote]And that usually comes from a matter of ideology - GBrank[GBC]1v0ry_k1ng prefers minimalist stat++/stat-- changes. Discussing larger issues that may contribute to Unit X's problems causes threadjacks because the thread is now about the larger issue, so I see the frustration.
|
| 2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
| 3 |
But if you maintain a laser-like focus at single-unit problems, you ignore larger issues in the game. I mean, in his big UP-unit-list-post, he included almost *every* slow or disarm unit in the game... but then raged when I suggested a blanket-buff on the disarm/slow powers themselves by combining them. Is that the right answer? Idunno. Maybe not. But is it off-topic/tangential? I don't think so[/quote]
|
3 |
But if you maintain a laser-like focus at single-unit problems, you ignore larger issues in the game. I mean, in his big UP-unit-list-post, he included almost *every* slow or disarm unit in the game... but then raged when I suggested a blanket-buff on the disarm/slow powers themselves by combining them. Is that the right answer? Idunno. Maybe not. But is it off-topic/tangential? I don't think so[/quote]
|
| 4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
| 5 |
OP post does not refer to you in particular Pxtl, though as you say you do tend to neon
|
5 |
OP post does not refer to you in particular Pxtl, though as you say you do tend to neon
|
| 6 |
\n
|
6 |
\n
|
| 7 |
I'll phrase my response in the form of a picture:
|
7 |
I'll phrase my response in the form of a picture:
|
| 8 |
\n
|
8 |
\n
|
| 9 |
[img]http://i.imgur.com/Es4dqYJ.png[/img]
|
9 |
[img]http://i.imgur.com/Es4dqYJ.png[/img]
|
| 10 |
\n
|
10 |
\n
|
| 11 |
I want a)
|
11 |
I want a)
|
| 12 |
I dont want b)
|
12 |
I dont want b)
|
| 13 |
\n
|
13 |
\n
|
| 14 |
b) is entirely pointless. the Devs make the big decisions. you do not influence the devs very much, who likely get their inspiration from sources other than your posts.
|
14 |
b) is entirely pointless. the Devs make the big decisions. you do not influence the devs very much, who likely get their inspiration from sources other than your posts.
|
| 15 |
\n
|
15 |
\n
|
| 16 |
Balance
discussion
is
primarily
for
BALANCE
FEEDBACK,
nothing
more.
If
you
want
to
ask
the
devs
to
change
the
game
to
adhere
to
your
vision,
do
so
elsewhere.
If
the
thread
was
asking
for
discussion
of
larger
issues,
that
is
fine
-
but
If
the
thread
is
infact
discussing
balance,
keep
the
larger
issues
out
of
it.
the
devs
know
about
the
larger
issues
and
online
discussion
does
not
work
unless
the
topic
is
kept
laser-narrow
and
concise.
|
16 |
Balance
discussion
is
primarily
for
BALANCE
FEEDBACK,
nothing
more.
Balance
discussion
does
NOT
=
suggesting
changes
to
the
unit
beyond
minor
stat
changes.
Anything
more
would
be
a
separate
thread
suggesting
an
overhaul
of
the
unit.
|
|
|
17 |
\n
|
|
|
18 |
If the thread was asking for discussion of larger issues, that is fine - but If the thread is infact discussing balance, keep the larger issues out of it. Open a new thread for the larger issue.
|
|
|
19 |
\n
|
|
|
20 |
Online discussion in a single continual thread does not work unless the topic is kept laser-narrow and concise - the NEW THREAD button exists for a reason!
|
| 17 |
\n
|
21 |
\n
|
| 18 |
there
is
a
NEW
THREAD
button
for
a
reason.
I
entirely
relate
to
Freds
frustration.
|
22 |
I
entirely
relate
to
Freds
frustration.
|
Balance Subforum Request