Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

Ampbious units and the transport widgets

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
12/12/2013 8:00:43 AMMYrankxponen before revert after revert
12/12/2013 8:00:28 AMMYrankxponen before revert after revert
12/12/2013 8:00:09 AMMYrankxponen before revert after revert
12/12/2013 7:58:50 AMMYrankxponen before revert after revert
12/12/2013 7:58:33 AMMYrankxponen before revert after revert
12/12/2013 7:56:09 AMMYrankxponen before revert after revert
12/12/2013 7:53:47 AMMYrankxponen before revert after revert
Before After
1 I have reported 2 bug already (in Spring's bug report site), there're actually 3 bug but I don't know if I should report the 3rd, maybe Spring is just biased toward not giving underwater unit a lift and it will look silly if I report too many of same thing. 1 I have reported 2 bug already (in Spring's bug report site), there're actually 3 bug but I don't know if I should report the 3rd, maybe Spring is just biased toward not giving underwater unit a lift and it will look silly if I report too many of same thing.
2 \n 2 \n
3 Here @Kloot fixed a transport doesn't want to pickup Amphib floating at sea: 3 Here @Kloot fixed a transport doesn't want to pickup Amphib floating at sea:
4 http://springrts.com/mantis/view.php?id=4203 4 http://springrts.com/mantis/view.php?id=4203
5 Here I report transport doesn't want to unload Hover at sea 5 Here I report transport doesn't want to unload Hover at sea
6 http://springrts.com/mantis/view.php?id=4205 6 http://springrts.com/mantis/view.php?id=4205
7 I don't know if I should report the 3th one: LOAD command is cancelled if you try to LOAD submerged amphib :/ 7 I don't know if I should report the 3th one: LOAD command is cancelled if you try to LOAD submerged amphib :/
8 \n 8 \n
9 Maybe someone could report the 3rd one? also its better if you include a request to allow UNLOAD of amphibious unit at sea, so we don't need a hax to unload unit (currently I'm thinking of droping the unit). 9 Maybe someone could report the 3rd one? also its better if you include a request to allow UNLOAD of amphibious unit at sea, so we don't need a hax to unload unit (currently I'm thinking of droping the unit).
10 \n 10 \n
11 Maybe if I'm too demanding of fixing this all bug they going to think: "you-should-code-it-myyourself" kind of thing. . . ( lol) . I never want that, seriously. 11 Maybe if I'm too demanding of fixing this all bug they going to think: "you-should-code-it-yourself" kind of thing. . . ( lol) . I never want that, seriously.