| 1 |
[quote]I think what @Kyubey wanted to demonstrate is that banshee is a superior raider that isn't devastatingly overpowered only because of its specific vulnerability to Arbitrary Armament. [/quote]
|
1 |
[quote]I think what @Kyubey wanted to demonstrate is that banshee is a superior raider that isn't devastatingly overpowered only because of its specific vulnerability to Arbitrary Armament. [/quote]
|
| 2 |
As GF said (and as i was trying to point out in my previous post), the comparison is of zero qualitative use if you mix pros and cons.
|
2 |
As GF said (and as i was trying to point out in my previous post), the comparison is of zero qualitative use if you mix pros and cons.
|
| 3 |
\n
|
3 |
\n
|
| 4 |
And
your
statement
leaves
me
wondering
about
exactly
the
ambiguity
i
tried
to
resolve
in
@Failer's
post.
Only
one
of
the
interpretations
technically
makes
sense,
but
then
it
goes
exactly
against
the
point
of
the
debate
before
that
(
Sponge's
statement:
"Banshees
are
UP
because
AA",
to
which
Failer
and
apparently
Kyubey
replied
"AA
is
Banshee
counter,
thus
it's
not
UP/can
still
be
OP
".
Your
"Banshee's
vulnerability
to
AA
means
it's
not
OP"
interpretation
of
Kyubey's
statement
seems
contradictory
in
implied
intent)
.
|
4 |
And
your
statement
leaves
me
wondering
about
exactly
the
ambiguity
i
tried
to
resolve
in
@Failer's
post.
Only
one
of
the
interpretations
technically
makes
sense,
but
then
it
goes
exactly
against
the
point
of
the
debate
before
that
(
Sponge's
statement:
"Banshees
are
not
OP
because
AA",
to
which
Failer
and
apparently
Kyubey
replied
"AA
is
Banshee
counter,
a
unit
can
still
be
OP
despite
being
beaten
for
cost
by
its
counter".
Your
"Banshee's
vulnerability
to
AA
means
it's
not
OP"
interpretation
of
Kyubey's
statement
seems
contradictory
in
implied
intent)
.
|
Brawler problem?